Berjaya Land Berhad v Kerajaan Negeri Selangor (BA-25-8-03/2016)

High Court of Malaysia17 Apr 2026BA-25-8-03/2016

The written judgment as the court issued it, with the coram, case number, and source links. Every paragraph has its own anchor.

Open official source PDF Report an issue

Text

27/04/2026 09:57:33 BA-25-8-03/2016 Kand. 182 **Note : Serial number will be used to verify the originality of this document via eFILING po...

27/04/2026 09:57:33 BA-25-8-03/2016 Kand. 182 **Note : Serial number will be used to verify the originality of this document via eFILING portal **Note : Serial number will be used to verify the originality of this document via eFILING portal **Note : Serial number will be used to verify the originality of this document via eFILING portal **Note : Serial number will be used to verify the originality of this document via eFILING portal **Note : Serial number will be used to verify the originality of this document via eFILING portal **Note : Serial number will be used to verify the originality of this document via eFILING portal **Note : Serial number will be used to verify the originality of this document via eFILING portal **Note : Serial number will be used to verify the originality of this document via eFILING portal **Note : Serial number will be used to verify the originality of this document via eFILING portal

Something wrong on this page?

Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.

Report an issue Request removal

Malaysian judgment

Case metadata

Court: High Court of Malaysia
Decision date: 17 Apr 2026
Case number: BA-25-8-03/2016
Coram: YA Puan Narkunavathy Sundareson
Practice area: First and 5th Respondents' application for stay of execution of the Court order in relation to assessment of damages pending the hearing and disposal of the appeal in the Court of Appeal. The First and 5th Respondents failed to establish the existence of special circumstances. There was nothing before the Court that suggested that compelling them to pay this sum immediately would cause irreversible damage or render their appeal nugatory. It was a purely monetary judgment and the balance of convenience favours the Applicants
Version: Alasan Penghakiman 1
Published: 27 Apr 2026
Source ID: fcd1c97f-8265-47a7-af44-7afff80a6a80

Catchwords

First and 5th Respondents' application for stay of execution of the Court order in relation to assessment of damages pending the hearing and disposal of the appeal in the Court of Appeal. The First and 5th Respondents failed to establish the existence of special circumstances. There was nothing before the Court that suggested that compelling them to pay this sum immediately would cause irreversible damage or render their appeal nugatory. It was a purely monetary judgment and the balance of convenience favours the Applicants

Parties

1. ) Berjaya Land Berhad - applicant - ejudgment_parties
2. ) BERJAYA CITY SDN BHD - applicant - ejudgment_parties
3. ) SELAT MAKMUR SDN BHD - applicant - ejudgment_parties
1. ) Kerajaan Negeri Selangor - respondent - ejudgment_parties
2. ) XXXX - respondent - ejudgment_parties
3. ) Pengarah Pejabat Tanah & Galian Negeri Selangor - respondent - ejudgment_parties

Primary source

Compare this reader text against the official judgment source.

Open source PDF

Catchwords

Parties

1. ) Berjaya Land Berhad - applicant - ejudgment_parties

2. ) BERJAYA CITY SDN BHD - applicant - ejudgment_parties

3. ) SELAT MAKMUR SDN BHD - applicant - ejudgment_parties

1. ) Kerajaan Negeri Selangor - respondent - ejudgment_parties

2. ) XXXX - respondent - ejudgment_parties

3. ) Pengarah Pejabat Tanah & Galian Negeri Selangor - respondent - ejudgment_parties