Brunswick Sourcing Ltd v Intellascend Sdn Bhd (WA-22NCC-198-04/2021)

High Court of Malaysia9 Oct 2023

The written judgment as the court issued it, with the coram, case number, and source links. Every paragraph has its own anchor.

Open official source PDF Report an issue

Content

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF MALAYA AT KUALA LUMPUR (COMMERCIAL DIVISION) CIVIL SUIT NO. WA-22NCC-198-04/2021 BETWEEN BRUNSWICK SOURCING LTD

And

INTELLASCEND SDN BHD (Company No. 1225352-M)

NG LIAN HUAT (NRIC No.: 760902-14-5439) [sued in the capacity as director, officer, and shareholder of Intellascend Sdn Bhd] JUDGMENT A. Introduction [1] The plaintiff filed this claim against the defendants, seeking the return of sums it had paid for the purchase of gloves, and damages arising from the non-delivery of the gloves. The plaintiff also sought to lift the corporate veil of the 1st defendant, to make the 2nd defendant, a director

S/N I8xlLadTAkSPRFSmOH6Owg

Something wrong on this page?

Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.

Report an issue Request removal

Malaysian judgment

Case metadata

Court: High Court of Malaysia
Decision date: 9 Oct 2023
Case number: WA-22NCC-198-04/2021
Coram: YA Puan Adlin Binti Abdul Majid
Practice area: CONTRACT: Agreement to purchase gloves – Defendants dealt with supplier – Gloves not delivered – Whether the initial contract between the plaintiff and the 1st defendant was terminated – Whether the defendants are bound by further contracts entered into by the plaintiff – Whether the defendants had conspired to defraud the plaintiff COMPANY LAW: Corporate personality – Lifting of corporate veil – Whether the 1st defendant was established for a fraudulent purpose or to avoid legal liability – Whether corporate veil ought to be lifted
Version: Alasan Penghakiman 1
Published: 5 Nov 2024
Source ID: 2d65cc23-53a7-4402-8f44-54a6387e8ec2

Catchwords

CONTRACT: Agreement to purchase gloves – Defendants dealt with supplier – Gloves not delivered – Whether the initial contract between the plaintiff and the 1st defendant was terminated – Whether the defendants are bound by further contracts entered into by the plaintiff – Whether the defendants had conspired to defraud the plaintiff COMPANY LAW: Corporate personality – Lifting of corporate veil – Whether the 1st defendant was established for a fraudulent purpose or to avoid legal liability – Whether corporate veil ought to be lifted

Parties

BRUNSWICK SOURCING LTD - plaintiff - ejudgment_parties
1. ) INTELLASCEND SDN BHD - defendant - ejudgment_parties
2. ) Ng Lian Huat (Disaman Di Bawah Kapasiti Sebagai Pengarah, Pegawai Dan Pemegang Saham Intellascend Sdn. Bhd.) - defendant - ejudgment_parties

Primary source

Compare this reader text against the official judgment source.

Open source PDF

Catchwords