Cheah Chin Kean v True Fitness World Sdn Bhd (WA-28NCC-334-06/2017)

1.

LEE KWAI SENG (No. K/P: 860628-43-6838)

HO WAI YIN (No. K/P: 860327-56-5696)

MOH LAI JING (No. K/P: 680114-06-5171)

ABBY TAN BOON YEE (No. K/P: 811004-01-6376) 2

ALAN BASIL PETER (No. K/P: 810114-14-6089)

ANURATHA RAMANAIDU (No. K/P: 770518-08-7288)

BEH TUCK WOOI (No. K/P: 720924-07-5383 9. CHANDRA MOHGAN A/L G DEMUDU (No. K/P: 700403-08-5959)

CHEAH WENG KEAT (No. K/P: 790803-06-5481)

CHEE SHOO KEONG (No. K/P: 571228-08-5565)

CHEN CHEW HAR (No. K/P: 740902-14-5764)

CHEN FOOK YEIN (No. K/P: 811213-12-5181)

CHEW WAI HOE (No. K/P: 830526-14-5275)

CHIA SIN LIY (No. K/P: 810623-06-5404)

CHIA TIANG KIANG (No. K/P: 731009-14-5273)

CHONG PEI NEE (No. K/P: 731013-14-5292)

CHOO WEE LING (No. K/P: 770522-14-5532)

CHOW WAI FOO (No. K/P: 791210-06-5325 )

CHOW WAI FOO (No. K/P: 791210-06-5325 )

CHOY CHEE KHONG (No. K/P: 840920-05-5285)

CORNELIA TAY SUET CHENG (No. K/P: 690710-10-5706)

DENNIS YEOH GWAN JIN (No. K/P: 730215105403)

EDMOND LIM GIN SHENG (No. K/P: 821006-08-5411)

EDMUND WONG CHEE MUN (No. K/P: 861117-56-6193)

EE CHEE WAN (No. K/P: 790512-01-6057) 3

NG JING YI (No. K/P: 850529-02-5605)

FONG SOON WAI (No. K/P: 811031-14-6395)

FOO PUI SAN TAMMIE (No. K/P: 920604-10-6036)

FOONG YEE CHING (No. K/P: 900722-10-5298)

GOH YIN LIN (No. K/P: 890420-01-5792)

HIA NGEE YEOW (No. K/P: 720403-14-5091)

HOH YEAN MUN (No. K/P: 690227-10-6012)

HOO HUI NGOH (No. K/P: 740809-08-5090)

HOO SZE YEN (No. K/P: 790708-14-5342)

KEITH YEW SZE HAM (No. K/P: 780411-05-5365)

KHOR JIE QI (No. K/P: 940322-14-6396)

KHOR JIE YI (No. K/P: 920428-14-5334)

KIRAN KAUR A/P JOGINDAR SINGH (No. K/P: 580925-07-5180 )

KOAY HOOI LIN (No. K/P: 640605-07-5466)

KOH BOON WEI (No. K/P: 850924-01-5407)

KOON WEI LEONG (No. K/P: 850121-14-5785)

KU WAI FOONG (No. K/P: 850205-14-5491)

LAI PUI KHEONG (No. K/P: 730331-10-5291)

LEE KIT SENG (No. K/P: 761211-14-5645)

LEE WAT NGO (No. K/P: 620910-10-5766)

LEE YEK PENG (No. K/P: 851121-14-5201) 4

LEE YI TIAN (No. K/P: 901008-05-5486)

LEE YOKE CHIN (No. K/P: 660227-10-6656)

LEUK KENG MING (No. K/P: 860616-38-6547)

LIAN THNG KAIH (No. K/P: 790917-14-5471)

LIEW CHIAN KEONG (No. K/P: 770804-14-5215)

LIEW CHIN DWO (No. K/P: 780312-08-5665)

LIEW SOON FATT (No. K/P: 821205-14-5501)

LIM CHER (No. K/P: 630702-01-5984)

LIM FONG NYEE (No. K/P: 781115-14-5336)

LIM PHAN YUEN (No. K/P: 840730-14-5191)

LIM SUI JIN (No. K/P: 801031-05-5013)

LIM ZHI SAM (No. K/P: 950713-05-5191)

LINDA TEOH OON CHENG (No. K/P: 580515-07-5364)

LIONEL A/L ALFRED (No. K/P: 850604-10-5999)

LOKE FOO SOON (No. K/P: 851206-05-5513)

LOKE PHAIK POH (No. K/P: 580402-07-5528)

LOW LAI HOE (No. K/P: 810303-10-5262)

LUM POH PENG (No. K/P: 750409-10-5004)

MAH SENG WAI (No. K/P: 830510-14-5211)

MARGATHA MANY A/P ATHANARI (No. K/P: 550430-05-5316)

MARK YEOH GWAN HIN (No. K/P: 750422-14-5393) 5

MICHAEL CHEAH SENG JIN (No. K/P: 720520-07-5213)

MOHD AZMI BIN ZAHARAI (No. K/P: 791122-06-5903)

MONICA CHANG MUN YEE (No. K/P: 880916-08-5488)

NG PIO BERN (No. K/P: 760121-07-5589)

NG SIEW YEAN (No. K/P: 720426-09-5066)

NG WAN WOEI (No. K/P: 810808-02-5654)

NG WEE MING (No. K/P: 720719-14-5151)

NG WEI YEN (No. K/P: 590213-10-6152)

NITHYANANTHAN A/L NESADURAI (No. K/P: 591229-02-5669

NORLISAH BINTI MOHD RAMLI (No. K/P: 670910-01-5942)

ONG HOW BENG (No. K/P: 691118-08-5659)

PAUL WONG YEE KEONG (No. K/P: 7230418-10-5729)(sic)

PHANG KOK WENG (No. K/P: 820104-08-5437)

PHILIP SOON WEI-JUN (No. K/P: 851004-10-5455)

PHYLICIA YEO YEE SIEN (No. K/P: 860122-14-5540)

QUAH SEAN HUAY (No. K/P: 810609-10-5780)

QUAH WAN ER (No. K/P: 840422-10-5884)

QUAH WAN THENG (No. K/P: 860501-43-6284)

REUBEN PAUL (No. K/P: 720731-14-5445)

RICHARD BOAK (No. K/P: 710208-10-5239)

ROHANI BINTI HASHIM (No. K/P: 670103-11-5074) 6

SEE AI LING (No. K/P: 740421-14-5632)

SEK MAY LING (No. K/P: 630312-10-7410)

SELVARAJA A/L MURUGESU (No. K/P: 550422-10-6529)

SEM YONG HAO (No. K/P: 960531-56-5261)

SIAU CHO DIONG (No. K/P: 631113-08-6009)

SIVAKUMAR PARAURAMAN (No. K/P: 790812-06-5635)

SOONG CHEE HOE (No. K/P: 720303-08-5415)

SUTHICHANA THARMAPALAN (No. K/P: 740312-14-5158 )

SWAN SIEW FONG (No. K/P: 671024-10-6334)

TAI YOKE CHENG (No. K/P: 670208-08-5828)

TAN AI SIM (No. K/P: 660314-05-5324)

TAN CHOON YIT (No. K/P: 841009-08-6063)

TAN KAM LIN (No. K/P: 630911-08-6236)

TAN KIM FONG (No. K/P: 570804-08-5666)

TAN KUANG MING (No. K/P: 840322-14-5547)

TAN SIU NI (No. K/P: 880801-56-5326)

TAN TING SIN (No. K/P: 790809-07-5197)

TAN XIN NING (No. K/P: 900724-10-5574)

TAN YOKE SIM (No. K/P: 631209-08-5246)

TAY BEE HOON (No. K/P: 621027-07-5988)

TEOH PIT YIN (No. K/P: 751130-07-5367) 7

THAM CHUAN SIONG (No. K/P: 830314-10-5175)

THOO MEE LEE (No. K/P: 591019-03-5260)

TOMOKO MATSUI (No. Paspot: TZ0764239)

TRACY CHAN YEE LI (No. K/P: 770914-14-5654)

WONG CHOON EE (No. K/P: 771004-08-6071)

WONG CHUAN MEIN (No. K/P: 830401-10-5165)

WONG JAY KIE (No. K/P: 851117-14-5496)

WONG MOOI LEE (No. K/P: 740827-09-5022)

WONG TEE FATT (No. K/P: 751105-11-5275)

WOO BEE TING (No. K/P: 780912-14-5828)

WU CHEE KEONG (No. K/P: 650118-10-6957)

YAP POH LIN (No. K/P: 800101-08-6348)

YAU SUN FONG (No. K/P: 570611-05-5110)

YEE BEE LING (No. K/P: 631001-02-5594)

YEE PIK NGAN (No. K/P: 800228-14-5392)

YEE YOKE LIN (No. K/P: 640606-10-7490)

YEOH AIK CHEONG (No. K/P: 720703-07-5371)

YEOW CHEW SEONG (No. K/P: 630927-04-5332)

YIO LIM CHOONG (No. K/P: 860215-56-5181)

YONG MUI YUEN (No. K/P: 781010-14-5946)

YONG WEI CHEONG (No. K/P: 780605-14-5967) 8

ABDUL HADI BIN ABDUL MANAF (No. K/P: 900310-04-5321)

ANG YEE SHIN (No. K/P: 930421-07-5328)

CHAI HOOI JETT (No. K/P: 911003-14-5916)

CHAN FUN SHIN (No. K/P: 850627-05-5381)

CHEAH TEIK CHUAN (No. K/P: 841106-14-5133)

CHEAH YEE YANG (No. K/P: 900927-10-5785)

CHEE MEI LIN (No. K/P: 650318-04-5124)

CHEN CHEE MOON (No. K/P: 860419-43-5215)

CHEN TZE HUAYU (No. K/P: 860617-43-6120)

CHEONG PIK YIN (No. K/P: 900516-05-5305)

CHEW LI SA (No. K/P: 690824-01-5004)

`CHEW PING KEE (No. K/P: 860825-35-5560)

CHIA WEI HAW (No. K/P: 940814-14-6501)

CHIN ZE WEI (No. K/P: 890125-14-6167)

CHONG HOONG SERN (No. K/P: 880924-14-5081)

CHONG LAI PING (No. K/P: 680819-08-5762)

CHONG TONG SEONG (No. K/P: 461006-10-5199)

CHOO SLIM MEI (No. K/P: 881026-35-5612 )

CHOO SOOK LING (No. K/P: 910421-14-5164)

CHOONG WAI KIT (No. K/P: 801130-08-5111)

CHOY WAI HUN (No. K/P: 710527-10-5359) 9

CHRISTINE LOY SOK CHING (No. K/P: 930319-07-6076)

CHUA YIH CHING (No. K/P: 820918-07-5078)

DAVID LOH JIAN WEI (No. K/P: 911231-10-5465 )

DAVID TNEH CHENG ENG (No. K/P: 780825-07-5331)

DESMOND TAN CHIAM WEI (No. K/P: 851203-07-5869)

DHAMAYANTI A/P REGUNATHAN (No. K/P: 791209-14-5424)

DINESHWARAN A/L UMAKANTHAN (No. K/P: 810501-07-5073)

EE MENG SHI (No. K/P: 871224-06-5959)

ELIZABETH TAY (No. K/P: 670816-10-5562)

TAN LAY LAY (No. K/P: 800318-14-5070)

EOW WAI YEN (No. K/P: 860517-10-5125)

FAM YOKE LING (No. K/P: 710927-10-5366)

FAZIL AHMAD BIN TAUIDDIN (No. K/P: 820706-14-6225)

HENG FOONG YI @ WENDY (No. K/P: 660716-10-6454)

HEW CHUNG KEAT (No. K/P: 900816-10-5379)

HO CE-YI (No. K/P: 870125-10-5412)

HO CHING YI (No. K/P: 9910103-43-5230)(sic)

HO CHONG SIANG (No. K/P: 630707-08-5033)

HO YAN KANG (No. K/P: 01020-10-1463)(sic)

HUI YOONG SEONG (No. K/P: 820507-14-5991)

JAIKRISHEN SINGH A/L BHAGVINDER SINGH (No. K/P: 900208-14-6345) 10

JAIKRISHEN SINGH A/L BHAGVINDER SINGH (No. K/P: 900208-14-6345) menyaman bagi pihak MANDEV SINGH SOHAN (No. K/P: 020203-14-0897)

JAYNE TSUTSUMI @ CHEONG KIT BUNN (No. K/P: 670315-08-6260)

JOSEPHINE KOH YUNG AI (No. K/P: 650215-04-5316)

JULIAN OOI HOCK SENG (No. K/P: 670606-08-5487)

JUSTINE TAN MEI-ERN (No. K/P: 920210-14-6078)

K. SUNITA A/P T. VINAYAKA DAS (No. K/P: 760324-10-5426)

KOH POH LI (No. K/P: 771216-07-5892)

KOK SHWU JIUN (No. K/P: 860918-43-5682)

LAWRENCE ANDERSON BURLEY (No. Paspot: 537383077)

LEE CAI FOONG (No. K/P: 891126-10-5644)

LEE CHAI HOONG (No. K/P: 910205-10-5870)

LEE KHAI CHUN (No. K/P: 920129-10-5471)

LEE LAY NEE (No. K/P: 760322-03-5268)

LEE SIAO YEN (No. K/P: 640629-10-6570)

LEE SOOK FONG (No. K/P: 730309-06-5262)

LEE YEK PENG (No. K/P: 851121-14-5201)

LEONG EE MUN (No. K/P: 861225-43-6310)

LEONG HO FUN (No. K/P: 761202-08-5142)

LEONG MEI YEN (No. K/P: 840307-14-6488)

LI CHEE WAH (No. K/P: 910301-06-5995) 11

LIEW YIN WEI (No. K/P: 850214-08-6593)

LIM EE HARN (No. K/P: 941002-14-6914)

LIM GIAN SENG (No. K/P: 700110-10-5629)

LIM JIA HUI (No. K/P: 851206-14-6124)

LIM KEY YEE (No. K/P: 841207-10-5405)

LIM PUI MUN (No. K/P: 871113-35-5080)

LIM SZE YEUN (No. K/P: 870914-14-5812)

LIM YAU CHOY (No. K/P: 621227-06-5207)

LIM YOKE TOH (No. K/P: 670510-10-6036)

LIM YONG YAN (No. K/P: 860606-43-6387)

LING KUOK YONG (No. K/P: 880505-13-5081)

LIZA ROSEYLN KONG SIEW LING (No. K/P: 910930-14-5981)

LOH SIEW KHOUNG (No. K/P: 561211-07-5337)

LOO MENG FATT (No. K/P: 740915-14-5819)

LOW JIA SERN (No. K/P: 901216-04-5047)

LOW SOU FOONG (No. K/P: 750924-14-5748)

MAK PUI CHING (No. K/P: 840918-14-6444)

MICHAEL LIM CHUNG KEAT (No. K/P: 780822-07-5221)

MOHAMAD FAHMI BIN BASAR (No. K/P: 870328-52-5871)

MOHAMED EFTAL BIN MOHAMED EBRHAIM (No. K/P: 891229-14-6561) 12

MOHAMMAD NAJMI BIN MOHD NADZRI (No. K/P: 920221-14-6161)

MOHD MAZLAN BIN ABDUL RAZAK (No. K/P: 731013-01-6191)

NAH KAH HO (No. K/P: 900810-14-5505)

NAJWA BINTI MOHD NADZRI (No. K/P: 891118-14-6008)

NASHA BINTI MOHD NADZRI (No. K/P: 880619-87-5002)

NG SIAO CHI (No. K/P: 840412-14-6332)

NGU MEE KING (No. K/P: 651122-13-5528) menyaman bagi pihak TAY JIAN HUI (No. K/P: 010117-10-1147)

ONG BEAK TEIK (No. K/P: 650924-02-5369)

ONPIMOL BORIWAN (No. Paspot: AA493056)

OOI CHIEW BEE (No. K/P: 91094-10-5210)

OOI CHIEW EAN (No. K/P: 841228-07-5030)

PHANG KOK NENG (No. K/P: 820104-08-5437)

PHUAH SIEW KEAM (No. K/P: 630129-10-7578)

PHUNG HON KEAT (No. K/P: 910930-14-5891)

PUAN JIA HUI (No. K/P: 910901-91-5017

QUAH MIN SEE (No. K/P: 870706-14-6124)

QUAH MUI LENG (No. K/P: 730109-10-5012)

RAMES A/L SIVAPATHAM (No. K/P: 700726-08-6497)

RENUKA KUNATHEVAN (No. K/P: 770118-10-5280) 13

ROZARIO AUGUSTIN LAURENCE (No. K/P: 4611118-10-5505)

SEE WAI LIK (No. K/P: 901130-14-6779)

SEOW JOANNE (No. K/P: 991015-07-5436)

SEOW LAI HUAT (No. K/P: 620909-07-5459)

SUDESH A/L PRABHAKARAN (No. K/P: 800610-01-6064)

TAN AI SIM (No. K/P: 660314-05-5324)

TAN AY YONG (No. K/P: 731219-01-5813)

TAN CHIN KWEE (No. K/P: 711018-10-5275)

TAN ECHUN (No. K/P: 900130-01-6726)

TAN GEOK THIN (No. K/P: 840329-12-5020)

TAN NAM HONG (No. K/P: 570927-08-6407)

TAN PEI LI (No. K/P: 651107-06-5066)

TAN RICHARD (No. K/P: 840708-05-5173)

TAN SIAU WEI (No. K/P: 900328-12-5928)

TAN SIEW KUAN (No. K/P: 840328-08-5290 )

TAN SIEW PENG (No. K/P: 670907-07-5004)

TAN WEI WANG (No. K/P: 880924-04-5531)

TAN YAW HAN (No. K/P: 850120-10-5263 )

TANG EE THONG (No. K/P: 860912-56-5152)

TANG YEE LENG (No. K/P: 671222-08-5052)

TASHA LAI SOOK YEE (No. K/P: 921215-10-6176) 14

TAY SZE YANG (No. K/P: 931108-66-5035)

TEE CHOON PEI (No. K/P: 840121-01-6126)

TEE WEI JUN (No. K/P: 860720-59-5007 )

TEE WEI LUN (No. K/P: 830901-05-5379 )

TEH KOK WEI (No. K/P: 820622-14-5735 )

TEOH PING WAI (No. K/P: 721112-08-5310)

TERRY DIONY (No. K/P: 710620-12-5450 )

THINESSHWARY A/P YOGARAJAH (No. K/P: 891224-07-5514)

TOH HUI XING (No. K/P: 930105-04-5100)

UNGKU NAZLI BINTI UNGKU ISMAIL (No. K/P: 701017-71-5160)

UVANESAN KATHIRAVELU (No. K/P: 860911-43-7669 )

VENESE CHANG WAI YEE (No. K/P: 860820-38-5234)

VIMALA DEVI NAIDU A/P SADASIVAN (No. K/P: 811113-01-6148)

VISHNU A/L GOVINDASAMY (No. K/P: 800117-01-6475)

WILSON LIEW YEONG (No. K/P: 901207-07-5025)

WONG AN JIE (No. K/P: 890127-14-5117)

WONG KEAN YIP (No. K/P: 901207-07-5025)

WONG LEE YUNG (No. K/P: 830824-14-5476)

WOON HOOI YIN (No. K/P: 9201016-14-5868)

WOON YEN YEN (No. K/P: 900522-10-5744)

YANG KUOH YEONG (No. K/P: 930804-05-5228) 15

YAP BEE LIN (No. K/P: 710820-10-5956)

YAP CHUI TENG (No. K/P: 861113-56-6110)

YAP JIAN HEUNG (No. K/P: 801228-12-5505)

YAP KWEI MOI (No. K/P: 790219-14-5298)

YAP LEE TENG (No. K/P: 881227-56-6264

YAP POH AIK (No. K/P: 870511-10-5699 )

YAP SHOON YEE (No. K/P: 961021-10-5833)

YEAH HSING YEE (No. K/P: 900726-14-6273)

YEE WAI SEE (No. K/P: 910518-08-5532)

YEO KHENG GEE (No. K/P: 650228-04-5382)

YEOH CHEE CHUEN (No. K/P: 850420-08-5401)

YEW TUCK SENG (No. K/P: 741210-07-5077)

YONG HUI LING (No. K/P: 790710-06-5212)

YONG JEN SHIUN (No. K/P: 810622-14-5015)

YONG MUI YUEN (No. K/P: 781010-14-5946)

YONG SHIEW FHUI (No. K/P: 820709-14-5228)

YONG WEI CHEONG (No. K/P: 780605-14-5967)

YONG ZHI SHIUN (No. K/P: 941204-10-5491)

YUEN YOKE SIEW (No. K/P: 600226-08-5676)

ZIKRA BINTI ISMAIL (No. K/P: 791204-14-5628) 16

ALAN YEO (No. K/P: 760912-04-5167)

BALRAJ RAMANATHAN (No. K/P: 540227-07-5435)

BERNARD LIM SOO HAN (No. K/P: 720507-10-5203)

CHEAH POH YEN (No. K/P: 861014-14-5046)

CHEN FAWN KEONG (No. K/P: 730408-14-5081)

DING LIANG WONG (No. K/P: 451218-08-5063)

ELLEN HUI YUEN FONG (No. K/P: 681012-12-5246)

GAN LI YING (No. K/P: 730210-01-5580)

GUO YUAN YUAN (No. K/P: 751221-74-5012)

GURDIP KAUR A/P AMAR SINGH (No. K/P: 521114-10-5972)

HARITH MENON (No. K/P: 690914-10-5345)

HARITH MENON (No. K/P: 690914-10-5345) menyaman bagi pihak SHREYA MENON (No. K/P: 001126-66-0114)

INDYRANY A/P G. KANNAIYA (No. K/P: 600719-11-5212)

LEE HUI WAH (No. K/P: 731005-14-5612)

LIONG FUH CHANG (No. K/P: 830628-12-5013)

LOH KOK HOONG (No. K/P: 640602-06-5537)

LYNNDY LEE LI PING (No. K/P: 791017-04-5410)

MARCUS NG LOONG HONG (No. K/P: 841012-10-5157)

NG FAN HUA (No. K/P: 880330-02-5250)

PETER RAJ A/L ADAIKALAM (No. K/P: 680815-05-5195) 17

SANGEETHA A/P CHELLADORAI (No. K/P: 800917-07-5748)

SHEILA GAN YEEN LIANG (No. K/P: 850415-13-5304)

SHEILA RS NATHAN (No. K/P: 630301-10-8346)

SUGITHA A/P SELVARAJA SINGAM (No. K/P: 761207-05-5452)

TAN CHUN KEAT (No. K/P: 890508-07-5757)

TAN HONG JIE (No. K/P: 930905-10-5503)

THIVAKARAN A/L SIVARAMAN (No. K/P: 780720-06-5401)

VICTOR LIM FUNG TUANG (No. K/P: 720124-10-5177)

WAI SUE LENG (No. K/P: 840527-10-5100)

YONG JUNE FOOK (No. K/P: 741103-13-5249)

GIAM SZE SEONG MERVYN (No. K/P: 770607-14-5005)

LIM KEE HUAT … PEMOHON- (No. K/P: 670725-10-5313) PEMOHON PENGGULUNGAN SYARIKAT NO: WA-28NCC-336-06/2017 Dalam perkara mengenai Truest Sdn Bhd (No. Syarikat: 711894-T) Dan Dalam perkara Seksyen 465(1)(e) dan 466(1)(a) Akta Syarikat 2016 Antara 18 Dan TRUEST SDN BHD (No. Syarikat: 711894-T) Dan PENGGULUNGAN SYARIKAT NO: WA-28NCC-338-06/2017 Dalam perkara mengenai True Yoga Sdn Bhd (No. Syarikat: 673491-K) Dan Dalam perkara Seksyen 465(1)(e) dan 466(1)(a) Akta Syarikat 2016 Antara Dan TRUE YOGA SDN BHD (No. Syarikat: 673491-K) Dan 19 PENGGULUNGAN SYARIKAT NO: WA-28NCC-342-06/2017 Dalam perkara mengenai Fitness Growth Sdn Bhd (No. Syarikat: 692832-X) Dan Dalam perkara Seksyen 465(1)(e) dan 466(1)(a) Akta Syarikat 2016 Antara Dan FITNESS GROWTH SDN BHD (No. Syarikat: 692832-X) Dan GROUNDS OF DECISION [1] There are altogether 4 Winding Up Petitions filed on 3/6/2017 before the Court:

WA-28NCC-334-06/2017, the Respondent company being True

(ii) WA-28NCC-336-06/2017, the Respondent company being Truest Sdn Bhd (‘Petition 336’); 20

(iii) WA-28NCC-338-06/2017 the Respondent company being True Yoga Sdn Bhd (‘Petition 338’); and

(iv) WA-28NCC-342-06/2017 the Respondent company being Fitness Growth Sdn Bhd (‘Petition 342’). [2] The Applicants have filed 2 Notice of Motions in Petition 334:

Encl.20 - the Applicants’ application pursuant to s.471 of the Companies Act 2016 (‘CA 2016’) and the inherent jurisdiction of the Court pursuant to O.92 r.4 of the Rules of Court 2012 (‘ROC 2012’); and

(ii) Encl.10 - the Applicants’ application pursuant to ss.470(1), 502(1) and 502(3), 540(1) CA 2016 and the inherent jurisdiction of the Court pursuant to O.92 r.4 ROC 2012. [2.1] In encl.20 the Applicants prayed for - “1. Bahawa kebenaran nunc pro tunc diberikan kepada Pemohon-Pemohon di atas untuk memulakan prosiding undang-undang terhadap Responden sebagai salah satu Defendan dalam satu guaman Mahkamah Tinggi Shah Alam;

Bahawa kebenaran diberi untuk mana-mana ali-ahli gim Responden yang ingin memfailkan tindakan guaman terhadap Responden;

Kos permohonan ini dan kos-kos berkaitan dijadikan kos dalam kausa; dan

Sebarang perintah lain dan lanjut yang dianggap wajar dan adil oleh Mahkamah yang Mulia ini”. (‘S.471 application’) [2.2] In encl.10 the Applicants prayed for - “(a) Pemohon-Pemohon diberi kebenaran untuk memfailkan Permohonan ini;

Pemohon-Pemohon diberi kebenaran untuk memasuki tindakan ini sebagai pemiutang-pemiutang sah dan juga sebagai mewakili pemiutang-pemiutang sah yang lain;

Satu perintah penggantungan prosiding penggulungan Responden sementara menunggu pelupusan pendengaran Permohonan ini; 21

Satu perintah untuk mengarahkan kehadiran serta-merta Muhammad Redha Ahmad Bin Thaharuddin (No Kad Pengenalan: 571204-07- 5469) (Pengarah), Patrick John Wee Ewe Seng (S1658841E) (Pengarah), Peter Joseph A/L Anthony Joseph Bennit (No Kad Pengenalan: 670627-04-5265) (Pengarah), Shikha Dutt A/P Delip Kumar Dutt (No Kad Pengenalan: 561205-05-5516) (Setiausaha), dan nama-nama lain yang berkaitan di Mahkamah bagi tujuan pemeriksaan di bawah seksyen 502(1) Akta Syarikat 2016 berkenaan penutupan mengejut gim-gim/cawangan-cawangan True Fitness di seluruh Malaysia tanpa notis-notis munasabah;

Satu perintah untuk mengarahkan kehadiran serta-merta Muhammad Redha Ahmad Bin Thaharuddin (No Kad Pengenalan: 571204-07- 5469) (Pengarah), Patrick John Wee Ewe Seng (S1658841E) (Pengarah), Peter Joseph A/L Anthony Joseph Bennit (No Kad Pengenalan: 670627-04-5265) (Pengarah), Shikha Dutt A/P Delip Kumar Dutt (No Kad Pengenalan: 561205-05-5516) (Setiausaha), dan nama-nama lain yang berkaitan berserta dokumen-dokumen berkaitan di Mahkamah bagi tujuan pemeriksaan di bawah seksyen 502(3) Akta Syarikat 2016 berkenaan penutupan mengejut gim-gim/cawangan-cawangan True Fitness di seluruh Malaysia tanpa notis-notis munasabah;

Berikutan perintah pohonan di perenggan (d) dan (e) di atas, jika Mahkamah yang Mulia ini mendapati bahawa pihak-pihak berkenaan tidak dapat memberikan satu penjelasan yang munasabah, dipohon perintah di bawah seksyen 540(1) Akta Syarikat 2016 bahawa pihak-pihak berkenaan telah terlibat secara langsung atau tidak langsung dengan perdagangan penipuan (fraudulent trading) dengan niat untuk menipu kesemua ahli-ahli, pembekal-pembekal dan pekerja-pekerja True Fitness di Malaysia dan bahawa kesemua pihak-pihak yang dinamakan di perenggan (d) dan (e) di atas adalah bertanggungjawab secara kendiri dan tanpa batasan terhadap liabiliti bagi kesemua atau mana-mana hutang atau liabiliti-liabiliti Responden;

Jikalau perintah-perintah sepertimana di pohonan-pohonan di atas dibenarkan oleh Mahkamah yang Mulia ini, satu saranan (advice) dikeluarkan kepada Jabatan Peguam Negara dan Polis Diraja Malaysia untuk pihak-pihak sepertimana dinamakan di perenggan (d) dan (e) di atas dan nama-nama lain yang berkaitan dihadapkan untuk siasatan jenayah dijalankan;

Kos Permohonan ini dan kos-kos berkaitan ditanggung sepenuhnya oleh Responden;

Apa-apa perintah atau selanjutnya yang difikirkan patut dan sesuai oleh Mahkamah yang Mulia ini”. (‘Ss. 470(1), 502(1) and 502(3) and 540(1) application’) 22 [3] The Applicants have filed identical corresponding Notice of Motions in the other 3 Petitions:

Petition 336- encl.15 and encl.12;

(ii) Petition 338- encl.17 and encl.12;

(iii) Petition 342- encl.19 and encl.12. [4] The hearing of the respective Notices of Motion in the respective Petitions proceeded on the basis of the Court hearing the submissions of the parties in respect of the 2 Notices of Motion in Petition 334 as the factual matrix and issues surrounding the other applications in the other 3 Petitions are identical as well. Background to the Notices of Motion [5] True Fitness World Sdn. Bhd. (‘True Fitness World’), Truest Sdn. Bhd. (‘Truest’), True Yoga Sdn. Bhd. (‘True Yoga’), Fitness Growth Sdn. Bhd. (‘Fitness Growth’), True Haven Sdn. Bhd. and True Fitness Sdn. Bhd. are a group of companies in Malaysia that runs a business operating gyms known as ‘True Fitness Group’ (‘TFG’) in Malaysia. TFG consist of the aforesaid 6 companies. [6] All 6 companies owned are by a holding company known as CJ Group Ltd, a Singaporean Company, whose director is Patrick John Ewe Seng (S1658841E) (‘Patrick John’) and one Cecilia Wee Chong Jin Nee (S0000008F). [7] In all of the said 6 companies, Patrick John Wee Ewe Seng, Muhammad Redha Ahmad Bin Thaharuddin (I/C No: 571204-07-5469) (‘Muhd Redha’) and Peter Joseph A/L Anthony Joseph Bennit (I/C No: 23 670627-04-5265) (‘Peter Joseph’) appear as directors of all of the companies which are associated with the True Fitness brand. [8] The Applicants are a small part of the large group of members of the True Fitness Brand of gyms of which they claimed they have a contractual relationship with the gym which consists of the 6 companies. [9] On 10/6/2017, the True Fitness brand of gyms suddenly and without any notice ceased all operations in Malaysia. [10] On 9/6/2017, one day before ceasing operations, True Fitness World, Truest, True Yoga and Fitness Growth had obtained a Court order to appoint an Interim Liquidator. Notwithstanding this, the members were not given any notice or information about the proceedings that were being carried out. [11] Miss Wong Shan Ty had published in the newspapers an advertisement dated 22/6/2017 that she had been appointed as an Interim Liquidator for the 6 companies. [12] One of the Directors of the True Fitness World, Patrick John Wee Ewe Seng, a Singaporean national bearing passport number (S1658841E) had provided an undertaking to a limited liability company registered in the Cayman Islands named Tongfang Kontafarma Holdings Limited to close all the operations of the True Fitness brand of gyms in Malaysia and Thailand on/or before 31/12/2017 in exchange for capital injection that will allow his holding company True Group in Singapore, 24 wherein he is the Chief Executive Officer to expand into the Chinese market. [13] No notices were given by Patrick John, his directors or officers to the gym members, the staff nor the vendors of True Fitness World, Truest, True Yoga and Fitness Growth. [14] Up and until 10/6/2017, True Fitness World,Truest, True Yoga and Fitness Growth were still renewing the memberships and was signing up new members aggressively, some of which had signed up for lifetime memberships which require substantial fees. S.471 application [15] S.471 CA 2016 provides - “471. Action or proceeding stayed after winding up order

When a winding up order has been made or an interim liquidator has been appointed, no action or proceeding shall be proceeded with or commenced against the company except by leave of the Court and in accordance with such terms as the Court imposes.

The application for leave under subsection (1) shall be made in the Court granting the winding up order and shall be served on the liquidator.

The office copy of the order for leave under subsection (1) shall be lodged by the applicant referred to in subsection 470(1) with the Registrar and with the Official Receiver within fourteen days from the making of the order”. [15.1] Reading subsection 471(3), the applicant envisaged in subsection 471(1) is an applicant referred to in subsection 470(1) CA 2016, i.e, “the company or any creditor or contributory.” [16] There are altogether 321 Applicants involved in the s.471 application. I shall rely on the “Jadual Komen”, exh.A in encl.58 (Petition 334), Affidavit in Reply affirmed by Wong Shan Ty on 25/8/2017. 25 I rule that except for Applicants no. 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 9, 11, 16, 23, 26, 33, 36, 39, 44, 45, 46, 50, 55, 58, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 66, 68, 70, 71, 72, 78, 79, 80, 82, 83, 88, 89, 90, 97, 98, 99, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 110, 113, 116, 117, 121, 122, 123, 124, 127, 128, 130, 131, 132, 136, 137, 142, 145, 146, 150, 151, 154, 158, 159, 160, 165 (member since 5/6/2017 but all the 4 Petitions were filed on 3/6/2017), 168, 169, 170, 171, 172, 173, 175, 176, 179, 181, 192, 194, 200, 204, 205, 206, 207, 208, 211, 214, 215, 216, 217, 218, 219, 226, 227, 228, 229, 230, 232 (membership begins on 14/7/17 but all 4 Petitions were filed on 3/6/2017), 236, 237, 242, 243, 245, 246, 249, 250, 251, 257, 262, 263, 264, 272, 277, 280, 284, 287, 288, 290, 291, 296, 302, 306, 310, 313 and 325, the remaining Applicants are “creditors”. These Applicants have proved they are members of the relevant gyms owned by True Fitness World, Truest, True Yoga or Fitness Growth and that they have a contractual relationship with them. [17] S.471 CA 2016 is in pari materia with s.243 of CA 1965. In Mesuntung Property Sdn Bhd v Kimlin Housing Development Sdn Bhd [2014] 4 MLJ 886, David Wong Dak Wah JCA (delivering the judgment of the Court of Appeal) at p.887 held - “(1) Under s 226(3) of the Act, before leave is granted, the appellant had the burden of satisfying the court of two criteria:

that the appellant's claim could not be adequately dealt with by the winding up court; and (b) that the appellant had a prima facie case against the respondent.

There was little doubt that the appellant's claim of specific performance could not be dealt with by the winding up court in that its claim was unlike say a proof of debt. In short it was not a monetary claim (see para 24).

As to what amounts to prima facie in the context of s 226(3) of the Act, it is simply whether there is a serious dispute between the litigants which warrant a trial to determine the truth of the combating allegations”. 26 It is to be noted that s.226(3) CA 1965 referred to by the Court of Appeal relates to, amongst others, the provision when a provisional liquidator has been made, leave of the Court before action or proceeding can be proceeded with or commenced against the company is required. [18] In Shencourt Sdn Bhd v Perumahan NCK Sdn Bhd [2008] 5 MLJ 191, Zulkefli JCA (now PCA) at 195 [10] and 196[11] opined - “On the guiding principle for the court to grant leave with a view to commencing action against a company that has been wound up we would like to refer to the case of Mosbert Bhd (In Liquidation) v Stella D'Cruz [1985] 2 MLJ 446 wherein Sean SCJ, in delivering the judgment of the Supreme Court at p 447 had this to say: In re Cuthbert Lead Smelting Co Ltd [1886] WN 84 it was held that if the applicant could obtain all the relief in the winding up leave would be refused. In short, the court will always give an application for leave if his claim cannot be dealt with adequately in the winding up or if the remedy he seeks cannot be given to him in a winding up proceedings. [11] It is clear based on the above cited case authority leave to proceed would only be granted when the plaintiff's claim cannot be adequately dealt with in winding up of the defendant's company or when the plaintiff is seeking a remedy which cannot be given in the winding up of the defendant's company”. [18.1] As rightly pointed out by Counsel for the Applicants, it is worth noting the Court of Appeal allowed the application for leave as - “a. There were declaratory orders prayed for; b. There were general damages to be assessed; c. There was a counterclaim and a set off; and d. The liquidators cannot adequately deal with the above prayer for relief and thus it is for the trial court to do so as”. [19] Based on the factual matrix of the instant case in my considered view, the Applicants have a prima facie cause of action against the Respondents in the 4 Petitions; there are serious issues between the litigants which warrant a trial to determine the truth of the allegations, the reliefs to be prayed for in the suits intended to be brought by the 27 Applicants cannot be dealt with adequately in the winding up Court as it is envisaged the reliefs which they seek will include ascertainment of general damages, compensation costs, specific damages and declarations and specific performance. Hence in my judgment having satisfied the criteria for seeking leave of the Court, the Court grants OIT of prayers 1 and 3 only. Ss.470(1), 502(1) and 502(3) and 540(1) application [20] In respect of this application there are only 4 Applicants - Seik Yean Young, Lee Kwai Seng, Ho Wai Yin and Moh Lai Jing (‘1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th Applicants’) respectively. [21] S.470(1) CA 2016 states - “At any time after the presentation of a winding up petition and before a winding up order has been made, the company or any creditor or contributory may, where any action or proceeding against the company is pending, apply to the Court for an order to stay or restrain further proceedings in the action or proceeding, and the Court may stay or restrain the action or proceeding accordingly on such terms as it thinks fit.”

The applicant shall lodge with the Registrar the office copy of the order within fourteen days from the making of such order under subsection (1)”. [22] The preliminary issue to be determined is whether the 1st to 4th Applicants are “creditors”. I have examined exh.LKS-2 in encl.55, Affidavit affirmed by Lee Kwai Seng on 10/8/2017 and I agree with the submission of Counsel for the Directors and proposed examinees, Mr. Srimurugan that - “(a) The 2nd applicant does not have any contractual relationship with the Respondent Company. The membership application form (agreement) exhibited by 2nd applicant is empty, with no signatures of either the Respondent company or the 2nd Applicant himself. There is also no proof that he had paid any money to the Respondent Company; 28

The 3rd applicant’s membership application form (agreement) exhibited is also doubtful as the name his name does not appear legible and no proof payment has been shown that he had paid money to the

The 4th applicant also does not have any contractual relationship with the Respondent Company. The 4th applicant only appears to have a contract with another company known as True Fitness Sdn. Bhd. and not the Respondent Company in suit 342”. [22.1] Further, with respect to the purported “Agreement” exhibited in respect of the 1st to 4th Applicants there are “No further membership details” unlike those exhibited in Jadual A and B in encl.42, Affidavit Tambahan Ke-2 affirmed by Lee Kwai Seng on 10/8/2017. [22.2] Therefore I find the 1st to 4th Applicants are not creditors. [23] S.470(1) is in pari materia to s.222 of CA 1965. Therefore it is relevant to consider the case of Sri Jeluda Sdn Bhd v Pentalink Sdn Bhd [2008] 3 AMR 697. Ahmad Maarop JCA (now CJ Malaya) (delivering the judgment of the Court of Appeal) at p.698 held - “1.(a) The use of the words “where any action or proceeding against the company is pending” before the words “apply to the court” and the use of the words “further proceedings in the action or proceeding” after the word “restrain” in s 222 of the Act clearly evince the intention of the legislature to empower the court to stay further proceedings in the action or proceeding (other than) the hearing of the winding-up petition in question which is pending before the court.

The purpose of giving the court the power under s 222 of the Act to stay further proceedings in the action or proceeding (other than the hearing of the winding-up petition pending before the court), is to enable the court to ensure that no creditor shall gain priority over others of his class.

Section 222 of the Act does not empower the court to stay the proceeding of the winding-up petition before it”. 29 [24] Premised on the aforesaid authority of Sri Jeluda (supra), the Applicants’ prayer for stay of proceedings under s.470(1) CA 2016 is misconceived and must fail. [25] S.502(1) CA 2016 provides - “The Court may summon before it any officer of the company or person known or suspected to have in his possession any property of the company or supposed to be indebted to the company, or any person whom the Court deems capable of giving information concerning the promotion, formation, trade dealings, affairs or property of the company”. [26] S.502(3) CA 2016 provides - “The Court may require the officer or person to produce any books and papers in his custody or power relating to the company, but if the officer or person claims any lien on books or papers, the production shall be without prejudice to that lien, and the Court shall have jurisdiction to determine all questions relating to that lien”. Ss.502(1) and 502(3) CA 2016 corresponds to s.249(1) and (3) CA

[27] In Hicom Bhd v. Bukit Cahaya Country Resorts Sdn Bhd & Anor [2005] 8 CLJ 194 at pp.207-208, Ramly Ali J (now FCJ) has set out instructively the principles governing an application for examination under s.249 CA 1965 as follows: “Section 249 must be read together with r. 49, Companies (Winding Up) Rules 1972. The effect of these provisions is that they confer on the liquidator, creditor or contributory the extraordinary right to apply to court for leave to query persons on oath and to require him to produce any books and papers in his custody relating to wound up company. The persons to be queried may include officers of the company (being wound up) and any other persons (third parties) known or suspected to have in his possession any property of the company as well as any persons whom the court considers capable of giving information concerning the promotion, formation, trade dealings, affirms or property of the company. Rule 49 specifically provides that such application, if made by the liquidator, shall be made ex parte but if made by a creditor or contributory, shall be made by summons supported by an affidavit and the 30 liquidator shall also be served. In other words, a unlike liquidator, creditor or contributory can only make such application by way of inter partes summons where the persons to be examined as well as the liquidator concerned must be served with the relevant papers. This extraordinary power serves an essential and important purpose. If used correctly it generally but not invariably redresses disadvantages without creating advantages. However if used incorrectly, it could be draconian in it's application and crushing in its consequence. Unnecessary legal costs can also be incurred by all involved and scarce fund of the company may be severely depleted, (see: Liquidator of W & P Piling Pte. Ltd. v. Chew in What & Ors. [2004] 3 SLR 164). Our legal proceedings are generally required to be conducted in the manner of an adverserial contest. The process of taking information or evidence on oath pursuant to these provisions, is an aberration which has been allowed into a fundamental tenet of an adversarial system. The court therefore plays an important and critical role in policing the exercise of these powers. In instances whether there is neither a reasonable basis for an investigation nor any real prospect of recouping loses or sustaining claims for the benefit of the company (being wound up) the court ought to be extremely cautious in allowing a proposed examination to proceed. The threshold test for information or documents is not one be of "absolute need" but that of a "reasonable requirement". The court must place on the scale of evaluation the purpose and the intent of an application on the one hand, and the oppression, inconvenience and disadvantage it may visit upon the proposed examinee one the other hand. In some instances, responses to the queries raised on oath or by way of an affidavit may be amply sufficient in place of an oral examination. If such relevant information can be procured without the exercise of this coercive power, it should not be invoked. The essential questions to be addressed are:

Is the procedure necessary for the business of preserving, collecting, managing or distributing the company's assets?;

Is the applicant (liquidator, creditor or contributory) conducting himself reasonably in the circumstances?;

Is it for the benefit of the company (being wound up)?;

Is there any alternative process to obtain such information either by way of sworn affidavit or otherwise?.

Is there any oppressive effect on the examinee?;

Does the process amount to an abuse of process?”. (Emphasis added) [27.1] Based on the emboldened parts in the passage quoted from Hicom Berhad’s case, I agree with the submission of Counsel for the 31 Supporting Creditors, Chan Park He On, Reezal Jai, Rihan bin Abdullah, Lee Chee Lin and Chong Lei Ling in Petition 342 and Johnny Yek Hock Hai in Petition 338 that -

S.249 CA 1965 when read together with rule 49 of the Companies (Winding Up) Rules 1972 has the effect of limiting the applicability of s.249 of CA 1965 to wound up companies;

(ii) Since the 4 Respondent companies, True Fitness World, Truest, True Yoga and Fitness Growth, have not been wound up, in my considered opinion the Applicants’ prayers for examination under ss.502(1) and 502(3) CA 2016 are premature and are accordingly dismissed by the Court. [27.2] An added reason why the 4 Applicants cannot rely on the provisions of ss.502(1) and 502(3) CA 2016 is because I have found that they are not creditors and therefore they do not have the locus standi to seek for examination of the proposed examinees and for the production of relevant documents in Court for examination. [28] Prayer (f) of ss.470(1), 502(1) and 502(3) and 540(1) application (encl.10) has been framed in such a manner that it is contingent on the Court making a finding that if it is not satisfied with the explanations to be proffered by the proposed examinees, then the Court is urged to make an order under s.540(1) CA 2016 against the proposed examinees that they are directly or indirectly involved in fraudulent trading with intent to defraud the members, suppliers and the employees of True Fitness in Malaysia and for the proposed examinees to be personally responsible, without any limitation of liability for the debts or liabilities of the Respondent company. [28.1] Since it is my finding that the Applicants cannot rely on ss.502(1) and 502(3) CA 2016, therefore prayer (f) is a non starter. 32 Whether the Court has the jurisdiction to advise the Attorney General Chambers or the Royal Malaysian Police on the proposed examinees [29] This relates to prayer (g) of the said Notice of Motion (encl.10). The Applicants are seeking for an order that the Court advise the Attorney General Chambers or the Royal Malaysian Police to investigate the proposed examinees, Muhammad Redha Ahmad Bin Thaharuddin, Peter Joseph A/L Anthony Joseph Bennit, Patrick John Wee Ewe Seng, Shikha Dutt and other named person. [29.1] In this regard I agree with Mr. Srimurugan’s submission that -

the Attorney General has the discretion whether to institute proceedings at all and, if so, with what offence to charge the accused by virtue of s.145(3) of the Federal Constitution (Teh Cheng Poh v. PP [1979] 1 MLJ 50); and

(ii) the Court does not have any power to make an order be it in the nature of advice against any party who is not a party in this proceedings. In Kheng Chwee Lian v. Wong Tak Thong [1983] 1 MLRA 66 at p.70, the Federal Court held - “In our judgment, the Court, below has no jurisdiction inherent or otherwise, over any person other than those properly brought before it, as parties or as persons treated as if they were parties under statutory provisions (Brydges v. Brydges & Wood [1909] p.187; Re Shephared [1890] 43 Ch D 131 and Coleman v. Coleman [1920] p.71)”. [29.2] In any event prayer (g) is a non starter as this prayer is only triggered if the orders in respect of prayers (a) to (f) above in encl.10 are granted. Conclusion [30] For the reasons enumerated above, I make the following order: 33

O.I.T of prayers 1 and 3 for - Petition 334- encl.20 Petition 336- encl.15 Petition 338- encl.17 Petition 342- encl. 9.

(ii) Dismiss the following with no order as to cost: Petition 334- encl.10 Petition 336- encl.12 Petition 338- encl.12 Petition 342- encl.12. [30.1] I make no order as to cost having regard to the fact that the 4 Respondent companies ceased operations in Malaysia suddenly and without notice on 10/6/2017 and which was one day after the appointment of an Interim Liquidator on 9/6/2017 upon the Petitioner’s application pursuant to s.476 CA 2016 in the 4 Petitions. Dated: 9/11/2017 SGD. (LAU BEE LAN) Judge 34 Counsel for the Petitioners: Cik Melanie Ho Mei Yee together with Encik C.J. Ooi Messrs Melanie Advocates & Solicitors C-3A- 3, Colonial @ Empire City Bukit Lanjan 47820 Petaling Jaya Selangor Darul Ehsan Counsel for the Applicants/Proposed Interveners: Encik Alex Netto together with Encik Chen Yu Szen Messrs Dee, Netto, Fatimah & Ng Advocates & Solicitors A- 3-19, Megan Phoenix Jalan 2/142A, Cheras 56000 Kuala Lumpur Counsel for the Supporting Creditors: Encik Bryan Ho Messrs Ho Partnership Advocates & Solicitors Suite A-11-3A, Level 11, Plaza Taragon Kelana No.3, Jalan SS 6/6 Kelana Jaya 47301 Petaling Jaya Selangor Darul Ehsan 35 Counsel for the Liquidators for Respondents: Encik C J Ooi together with Encik E K Khaw Messrs Chih-Jen & Associates Advocates & Solicitors No.7-19-M (Mezzanine Floor) Jalan Jalil Perkasa 14/155B Aked Esplanad Bukit Jalil 57000 Kuala Lumpur Counsel for the Directors & Proposed Examinees Encik Srimurugan a/l Alagan Messrs SRIMURUGAN & CO Advocates & Solicitors No.33-5-3A Block C Jaya One No.72A Jalan University 46200 Petaling Jaya Selangor Darul Ehsan