Manimaran A/L Supermaniam v Linde Malaysia Sdn Bhd (BA-23NCvC-41-09/2022)

High Court of Malaysia20 May 2025

The written judgment as the court issued it, with the coram, case number, and source links. Every paragraph has its own anchor.

Open official source PDF Report an issue

Content

29/12/2025 12:17:54 BA-23NCvC-41-09/2022 Kand. 137 S/N y3i7Ywgwk0W9kmJIJB/srw S/N y3i7Ywgwk0W9kmJIJB/srw S/N y3i7Ywgwk0W9kmJIJB/srw S/N y3i7Ywgwk0W9kmJIJB/srw S/N y3i7Ywgwk0W9kmJIJB/srw S/N y3i7Ywgwk0W9kmJIJB/srw S/N y3i7Ywgwk0W9kmJIJB/srw S/N y3i7Ywgwk0W9kmJIJB/srw S/N y3i7Ywgwk0W9kmJIJB/srw S/N y3i7Ywgwk0W9kmJIJB/srw S/N y3i7Ywgwk0W9kmJIJB/srw S/N y3i7Ywgwk0W9kmJIJB/srw S/N y3i7Ywgwk0W9kmJIJB/srw S/N y3i7Ywgwk0W9kmJIJB/srw S/N y3i7Ywgwk0W9kmJIJB/srw S/N y3i7Ywgwk0W9kmJIJB/srw S/N y3i7Ywgwk0W9kmJIJB/srw S/N y3i7Ywgwk0W9kmJIJB/srw S/N y3i7Ywgwk0W9kmJIJB/srw S/N y3i7Ywgwk0W9kmJIJB/srw S/N y3i7Ywgwk0W9kmJIJB/srw S/N y3i7Ywgwk0W9kmJIJB/srw S/N y3i7Ywgwk0W9kmJIJB/srw S/N y3i7Ywgwk0W9kmJIJB/srw S/N y3i7Ywgwk0W9kmJIJB/srw S/N y3i7Ywgwk0W9kmJIJB/srw S/N y3i7Ywgwk0W9kmJIJB/srw S/N y3i7Ywgwk0W9kmJIJB/srw S/N y3i7Ywgwk0W9kmJIJB/srw S/N y3i7Ywgwk0W9kmJIJB/srw S/N y3i7Ywgwk0W9kmJIJB/srw S/N y3i7Ywgwk0W9kmJIJB/srw

Something wrong on this page?

Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.

Report an issue Request removal

Malaysian judgment

Case metadata

Court: High Court of Malaysia
Decision date: 20 May 2025
Case number: BA-23NCvC-41-09/2022
Coram: YA Puan Jamhirah binti Ali
Practice area: TORT: Defamation – Elements of Defamation – Whether the Defamatory Statements was published – Defamatory statements via Whatsapp – Whether a show cause and termination letter can be considered as defamatory. Claim Dismissed. EVIDENCE: Burden of proof – Balance of Probabilities – Witness Statements filed without knowledge of witness
Version: Alasan Penghakiman 1
Published: 29 Dec 2025
Source ID: 63bb78cb-3008-4593-bd92-6248241fecaf

Catchwords

TORT: Defamation – Elements of Defamation – Whether the Defamatory Statements was published – Defamatory statements via Whatsapp – Whether a show cause and termination letter can be considered as defamatory. Claim Dismissed. EVIDENCE: Burden of proof – Balance of Probabilities – Witness Statements filed without knowledge of witness

Parties

MANIMARAN A/L SUPERMANIAM - plaintiff - ejudgment_parties
1. ) LINDE MALAYSIA SDN BHD - defendant - ejudgment_parties
2. ) YUEN YEE FEI - defendant - ejudgment_parties
3. ) TOLL INTEGRATED LOGISTICS (M) SDN BHD - defendant - ejudgment_parties
4. ) SIVAKUMAR A/L MUNIANDY - defendant - ejudgment_parties
5. ) HALEEN KAUR SANGHA - defendant - ejudgment_parties

Primary source

Compare this reader text against the official judgment source.

Open source PDF

Catchwords

Parties

MANIMARAN A/L SUPERMANIAM - plaintiff - ejudgment_parties

1. ) LINDE MALAYSIA SDN BHD - defendant - ejudgment_parties

2. ) YUEN YEE FEI - defendant - ejudgment_parties

3. ) TOLL INTEGRATED LOGISTICS (M) SDN BHD - defendant - ejudgment_parties

4. ) SIVAKUMAR A/L MUNIANDY - defendant - ejudgment_parties

5. ) HALEEN KAUR SANGHA - defendant - ejudgment_parties