MASTER CRAFT GROUP SDN BHD v Kemas Maju Construction Sdn Bhd (BA-24C-1-01/2025)

High Court of Malaysia24 Mar 2025

The written judgment as the court issued it, with the coram, case number, and source links. Every paragraph has its own anchor.

Open official source PDF Report an issue

Content

S/N FRbGnhm6V0mPnkrYdWK5kw S/N FRbGnhm6V0mPnkrYdWK5kw S/N FRbGnhm6V0mPnkrYdWK5kw S/N FRbGnhm6V0mPnkrYdWK5kw S/N FRbGnhm6V0mPnkrYdWK5kw S/N FRbGnhm6V0mPnkrYdWK5kw S/N FRbGnhm6V0mPnkrYdWK5kw S/N FRbGnhm6V0mPnkrYdWK5kw S/N FRbGnhm6V0mPnkrYdWK5kw S/N FRbGnhm6V0mPnkrYdWK5kw S/N FRbGnhm6V0mPnkrYdWK5kw S/N FRbGnhm6V0mPnkrYdWK5kw S/N FRbGnhm6V0mPnkrYdWK5kw S/N FRbGnhm6V0mPnkrYdWK5kw S/N FRbGnhm6V0mPnkrYdWK5kw S/N FRbGnhm6V0mPnkrYdWK5kw S/N FRbGnhm6V0mPnkrYdWK5kw S/N FRbGnhm6V0mPnkrYdWK5kw S/N FRbGnhm6V0mPnkrYdWK5kw S/N FRbGnhm6V0mPnkrYdWK5kw S/N FRbGnhm6V0mPnkrYdWK5kw S/N FRbGnhm6V0mPnkrYdWK5kw S/N FRbGnhm6V0mPnkrYdWK5kw S/N FRbGnhm6V0mPnkrYdWK5kw S/N FRbGnhm6V0mPnkrYdWK5kw S/N FRbGnhm6V0mPnkrYdWK5kw S/N FRbGnhm6V0mPnkrYdWK5kw S/N FRbGnhm6V0mPnkrYdWK5kw S/N FRbGnhm6V0mPnkrYdWK5kw S/N FRbGnhm6V0mPnkrYdWK5kw S/N FRbGnhm6V0mPnkrYdWK5kw S/N FRbGnhm6V0mPnkrYdWK5kw S/N FRbGnhm6V0mPnkrYdWK5kw S/N FRbGnhm6V0mPnkrYdWK5kw S/N FRbGnhm6V0mPnkrYdWK5kw S/N FRbGnhm6V0mPnkrYdWK5kw S/N FRbGnhm6V0mPnkrYdWK5kw S/N FRbGnhm6V0mPnkrYdWK5kw

Something wrong on this page?

Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.

Report an issue Request removal

Malaysian judgment

Case metadata

Court: High Court of Malaysia
Decision date: 24 Mar 2025
Case number: BA-24C-1-01/2025
Coram: YA Puan Sumathi a/p Murugiah
Practice area: The Adjudicator had failed to act impartially and independently and that the Adjudicator had acted in excess of his jurisdiction respectively in arriving to his conclusion of the Adjudication Proceedings. Kemas Maju has failed to establish Section 15(b) of the CIPAA 2012. No ambiguity in relation to the due dates of the payments claimed by Master Craft. Kemas Maju did not deny that at the time the Payment Claim was issued, all the payment invoices were already due for payment
Version: Alasan Penghakiman 1
Published: 12 Jun 2025
Source ID: 9ec61615-ba19-4957-8f9e-4ad87562b993

Catchwords

The Adjudicator had failed to act impartially and independently and that the Adjudicator had acted in excess of his jurisdiction respectively in arriving to his conclusion of the Adjudication Proceedings. Kemas Maju has failed to establish Section 15(b) of the CIPAA 2012. No ambiguity in relation to the due dates of the payments claimed by Master Craft. Kemas Maju did not deny that at the time the Payment Claim was issued, all the payment invoices were already due for payment

Parties

MASTER CRAFT GROUP SDN BHD - applicant - ejudgment_parties
Kemas Maju Construction Sdn Bhd - respondent - ejudgment_parties

Primary source

Compare this reader text against the official judgment source.

Open source PDF

Catchwords