Muhammad Abrar Bin Abd Wahab v Datuk Haji Ruji Bin Haji Ubi (Pengerusi Lembaga Tatatertib Kumpulan Sokongan (NO.1), Kementerian dalam Negeri (BA-25-14-02/2025)

High Court of Malaysia8 May 2026

The written judgment as the court issued it, with the coram, case number, and source links. Every paragraph has its own anchor.

Open official source PDF Report an issue

Content

S/N mQSNqevcS0qolwzFtTnhPA S/N mQSNqevcS0qolwzFtTnhPA S/N mQSNqevcS0qolwzFtTnhPA S/N mQSNqevcS0qolwzFtTnhPA S/N mQSNqevcS0qolwzFtTnhPA S/N mQSNqevcS0qolwzFtTnhPA S/N mQSNqevcS0qolwzFtTnhPA S/N mQSNqevcS0qolwzFtTnhPA S/N mQSNqevcS0qolwzFtTnhPA S/N mQSNqevcS0qolwzFtTnhPA S/N mQSNqevcS0qolwzFtTnhPA S/N mQSNqevcS0qolwzFtTnhPA S/N mQSNqevcS0qolwzFtTnhPA S/N mQSNqevcS0qolwzFtTnhPA

Something wrong on this page?

Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.

Report an issue Request removal

Malaysian judgment

Case metadata

Court: High Court of Malaysia
Decision date: 8 May 2026
Case number: BA-25-14-02/2025
Coram: YA Puan Narkunavathy Sundareson
Practice area: Substantive application for judicial to challenge against the Respondent's decision to dismiss the Applicant. The Applicant he was convicted of an offence under section 15(1)(a) Dangerous Drugs Act 1952 and the Applicant was subjected to disciplinary action. The Applicant challenged the Decision on the grounds that the Respondents have contravened Public Services Disciplinary Board Regulations 1993. The Respondents denied the Applicant’s allegation and contended that at all material times, they complied with the procedure for the Applicant’s disciplinary hearing and appeal His application was dismissed
Version: Alasan Penghakiman 1
Published: 10 Jun 2026
Source ID: a98d0499-dceb-4a4b-a897-0cc5b539e13c

Catchwords

Substantive application for judicial to challenge against the Respondent's decision to dismiss the Applicant. The Applicant he was convicted of an offence under section 15(1)(a) Dangerous Drugs Act 1952 and the Applicant was subjected to disciplinary action. The Applicant challenged the Decision on the grounds that the Respondents have contravened Public Services Disciplinary Board Regulations 1993. The Respondents denied the Applicant’s allegation and contended that at all material times, they complied with the procedure for the Applicant’s disciplinary hearing and appeal His application was dismissed

Parties

MUHAMMAD ABRAR BIN ABD WAHAB - applicant - ejudgment_parties
1. ) DATUK HAJI RUJI BIN HAJI UBI (PENGERUSI LEMBAGA TATATERTIB KUMPULAN SOKONGAN (NO.1), KEMENTERIAN DALAM NEGERI - respondent - ejudgment_parties
2. ) LEMBAGA RAYUAN TATATERTIB PERKHIDMATAN AWAM - respondent - ejudgment_parties
3. ) Lembaga Tatatertib Kumpulan Sokongan (No. 1) , Kementerian Dalam Negeri - respondent - ejudgment_parties
4. ) Kerajaan Malaysia - respondent - ejudgment_parties

Primary source

Compare this reader text against the official judgment source.

Open source PDF

Catchwords

Parties

MUHAMMAD ABRAR BIN ABD WAHAB - applicant - ejudgment_parties

1. ) DATUK HAJI RUJI BIN HAJI UBI (PENGERUSI LEMBAGA TATATERTIB KUMPULAN SOKONGAN (NO.1), KEMENTERIAN DALAM NEGERI - respondent - ejudgment_parties

2. ) LEMBAGA RAYUAN TATATERTIB PERKHIDMATAN AWAM - respondent - ejudgment_parties

3. ) Lembaga Tatatertib Kumpulan Sokongan (No. 1) , Kementerian Dalam Negeri - respondent - ejudgment_parties

4. ) Kerajaan Malaysia - respondent - ejudgment_parties