Pendakwa Raya v ONG KEH KEONG (BA-42(Ors)-6-12/2024)

High Court of Malaysia9 Dec 2025

The written judgment as the court issued it, with the coram, case number, and source links. Every paragraph has its own anchor.

Open official source PDF Report an issue

Content

09/03/2026 12:10:52 BA-42(Ors)-6-12/2024 Kand. 36

Something wrong on this page?

Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.

Report an issue Request removal

Malaysian judgment

Case metadata

Court: High Court of Malaysia
Decision date: 9 Dec 2025
Case number: BA-42(Ors)-6-12/2024
Coram: YA Puan Adlin Binti Abdul Majid
Practice area: CRIMINAL LAW: Money laundering – Application for forfeiture of monies by the prosecution – Whether the monies are the subject matter of the offence, or were used in the commission of the offence under section 4(1) of the Anti-Money Laundering and Anti-Terrorism Financing Act 2001 (“AMLATFA”) – Whether the respondent is the true and lawful owner of the monies – Whether the prosecution adduced sufficient evidence to support an application for forfeiture – Whether the setting aside of convictions under the AMLATFA negate the basis for forfeiture – Whether statutory requirements for forfeiture have been satisfied – Whether the monies ought to be forfeited – AMLATFA, ss. 4(1) and 55(1)
Version: Alasan Penghakiman 1
Published: 9 Mar 2026
Source ID: e8783a75-75f2-43c6-9dec-b9445af41d14

Catchwords

CRIMINAL LAW: Money laundering – Application for forfeiture of monies by the prosecution – Whether the monies are the subject matter of the offence, or were used in the commission of the offence under section 4(1) of the Anti-Money Laundering and Anti-Terrorism Financing Act 2001 (“AMLATFA”) – Whether the respondent is the true and lawful owner of the monies – Whether the prosecution adduced sufficient evidence to support an application for forfeiture – Whether the setting aside of convictions under the AMLATFA negate the basis for forfeiture – Whether statutory requirements for forfeiture have been satisfied – Whether the monies ought to be forfeited – AMLATFA, ss. 4(1) and 55(1)

Parties

Pendakwa Raya - appellant - ejudgment_parties
ONG KEH KEONG - respondent - ejudgment_parties

Primary source

Compare this reader text against the official judgment source.

Open source PDF

Catchwords