Malaysia legal search
Showing 10 results — more on the next page
BA-24F-247-08/2023
High Court of Malaysia23 June 2025
192. There is no doubt that this Court has full jurisdiction to issue binding orders upon Malaysian enforcement and administrative authorities. Under Article 126 of the Federal Constitution, superior courts possess inherent powers to ensure their orders are obeyed. By virtue of s
WA-45-8-11/2018
High Court of Malaysia26 December 2025
(H) SUBMISSIONS IN RESPECT OF SENTENCE [2115] I thereafter called upon parties to address this court in respect of sentence on the four (4) charges under section 23(1) MACC Act and the twenty-one (21) charges under section 4(1)(a) AMLATFA for which the accused has been found gui
WA-45-7-11/2018
High Court of Malaysia26 December 2025
(H) SUBMISSIONS IN RESPECT OF SENTENCE [2115] I thereafter called upon parties to address this court in respect of sentence on the four (4) charges under section 23(1) MACC Act and the twenty-one (21) charges under section 4(1)(a) AMLATFA for which the accused has been found gui
CA-25-12-10/2020
High Court of Malaysia24 April 2024
(iii) not asking this Court to ascertain doctrine of adverse possession in favour of the Applicants. S/N r3LNalDmO0yth8tlpOogoA **Note : Serial number will be used to verify the originality of this document via eFILING portal [71] That being the position of the Applicants, the A
CA-25-11-08/2020
High Court of Malaysia24 April 2024
(iii) not asking this Court to ascertain doctrine of adverse possession in favour of the Applicants. **Note : Serial number will be used to verify the originality of this document via eFILING portal [71] That being the position of the Applicants, the Applicants’ counsel made it
01(f)-13-09/2021(W)
Federal Court of Malaysia18 April 2023
444. As a result, public interest litigation has not been consonant with the rest of the jurisdictions in the common law or civil law world. This becomes a matter of considerable concern as it precludes or prohibits an essential feature of the Federal Constitution, namely the rig
BA-12BC-2-04/2021
High Court of Malaysia27 May 2022
as a general rule, the Costs Sum (After Trial) should be based on the Scale (Subordinate Court Trials) (General Rule). The application of the General Rule is clear from the words in O 59 r 23(1) RC, “the party entitled to costs shall, unless the Court **Note : Serial number
BA-12BC-1-04/2021
High Court of Malaysia27 May 2022
as a general rule, the Costs Sum (After Trial) should be based on the Scale (Subordinate Court Trials) (General Rule). The application of the General Rule is clear from the words in O 59 r 23(1) RC, “the party entitled to costs shall, unless the Court **Note : Serial number
WA-22C-13-02/2020
High Court of Malaysia22 July 2021
(M) Sdn Bhd & Ors [1996] 4 MLJ 515 Shamsudin Bin Shaik Jamaludin v Kenwood Electronics Technologies (M) Sdn Bhd [1999] 3 MLJ 438 Steven Phoa Cheng Loon & Ors v Highland Properties Sdn Bhd & Ors [2000] 4 MLJ 200 Sumita Development (M) Sdn Bhd v. Majlis Perbandaran Pulau Pinang
21IP-72-12/2014
High Court of Malaysia21 October 2021
(a) impede a party’s (X) fundamental right of access to justice as enshrined in Article 5(1) of the Federal Constitution (Fundamental Access To Justice); and