Malaysia legal search
Showing 10 results — more on the next page
WA-22NCvC-550-08/2024
High Court of Malaysia28 April 2025
(a) the CMS Documents contain private and confidential information regarding D1’s patients which is protected under the Personal Data Protection Act 2010 [Act 709];
JA-22NCvC-14-01/2023
High Court of Malaysia23 December 2025
31. Specifically, D1 (and similarly D2-D3) contended that Exhibits P1 and P2 were produced by way of subpoena without prior disclosure, contrary to Order 24 rule 7A of the Rules of Court 2012 and relied on Protasco Bhd v Tey Por Yee & Anor and another appeal [2021] MLJU 1756. Th
JA-22NCvC-14-01/2023
High Court of Malaysia23 December 2025
31. Specifically, D1 (and similarly D2-D3) contended that Exhibits P1 and P2 were produced by way of subpoena without prior disclosure, contrary to Order 24 rule 7A of the Rules of Court 2012 and relied on Protasco Bhd v Tey Por Yee & Anor and another appeal [2021] MLJU 1756. Th
JA-22NCvC-14-01/2023
High Court of Malaysia23 December 2025
31. Specifically, D1 (and similarly D2-D3) contended that Exhibits P1 and P2 were produced by way of subpoena without prior disclosure, contrary to Order 24 rule 7A of the Rules of Court 2012 and relied on Protasco Bhd v Tey Por Yee & Anor and another appeal [2021] MLJU 1756. Th
S-02(IM)(NCvC)-1936-10/2022
Court of Appeal of Malaysia22 January 2025
16. Furthermore, I am advised by the Respondents' solicitors and verily believe that the Applicant's reliance on the Personal Data Protection Act 2020 ("PDPA") is misplaced. The Applicant's solicitors also failed to specify the section of PDPA relied on by the Applicant. **Note
S-02(IM)(NCvC)-1920-10/2022
Court of Appeal of Malaysia22 January 2025
16. Furthermore, I am advised by the Respondents' solicitors and verily believe that the Applicant's reliance on the Personal Data Protection Act 2020 ("PDPA") is misplaced. The Applicant's solicitors also failed to specify the section of PDPA relied on by the Applicant. **Note
WA-22NCvC-647-10/2024
High Court of Malaysia6 May 2025
The test for discretionary limits on presumptive court openness has been expressed as a two-step inquiry involving the necessity and proportionality of the proposed order (Sierra Club, at para. 53). Upon examination, however, this test rests upon three core prerequisites tha
WA-22NCvC-647-10/2024
High Court of Malaysia6 May 2025
The test for discretionary limits on presumptive court openness has been expressed as a two-step inquiry involving the necessity and proportionality of the proposed order (Sierra Club, at para. 53). Upon examination, however, this test rests upon three core prerequisites tha
02(f)-14-05/2024(W)
Federal Court of Malaysia18 June 2025
2013. The tabulation of quantification of damages amounting to RM60 million are based on the audited accounts. [6] The Respondents further sought Aggravated Damages of RM250 million against Public Bank for the damages suffered by the Respondents. As a result of the disclosure b
BL-A52-4-04/2022
Sessions Court of Malaysia28 April 2025
(b) The car shall at all times be properly parked, in the said lot and within the designated area, The occupant whose designated car park lot is found wrongfully occupied by another car, is advised to report to the security guards. Any vehicles parked in te areas other than the d