Malaysia legal search
Showing 10 results — more on the next page
B-02(NCvC)(W)-263-02/2023
Court of Appeal of Malaysia19 May 2025
in the Singapore High Court case of STU v The Comptroller of Income Tax [1962] 1 MLJ 220, at 221, Tan Ah Tah J gave the following judgment-In this case certain explanations given by the appellant to the officers of the Income Tax Department were rejected on the ground that th
B-02(NCvC)(W)-231-02/2023
Court of Appeal of Malaysia19 May 2025
in the Singapore High Court case of STU v The Comptroller of Income Tax [1962] 1 MLJ 220, at 221, Tan Ah Tah J gave the following judgment-In this case certain explanations given by the appellant to the officers of the Income Tax Department were rejected on the ground that th
CA-A53KJ-255-09/2023
Sessions Court of Malaysia24 September 2025
(s) Kehilangan pendapatan masa hadapan dengan kadar RM2,000.00 sebulan sehingga plaintif 2 beruur 60 tahun. S/N IlqVkHyE2pTs65ozrTg **Note : Serial number will be used to verify the originality of this document via eFILING portal 178 Hujahan Plaintif Keterangan menunjukkan ba
PA-23NCvC-2-01/2021
High Court of Malaysia7 May 2025
227. I find that, at best, the MOT gave WGW a conditional preparedness to facilitate an application for tax deduction, which was subject to WGW’s formal application, and subject to compliance with the current applicable guidelines and the provisions of the Income Tax Act 1957.
PA-23NCvC-1-01/2021
High Court of Malaysia7 May 2025
227. I find that, at best, the MOT gave WGW a conditional preparedness to facilitate an application for tax deduction, which was subject to WGW’s formal application, and subject to compliance with the current applicable guidelines and the provisions of the Income Tax Act 1957.
CA-25-12-10/2020
High Court of Malaysia24 April 2024
(vi) In the determination of whether an applicant was adversely affected is a question for the court to determine, having regard to the factual and legal matrix of the grievance. In so doing, the court will adopt a broad and flexible approach. O. 53 r.2(4) is not to be construed
CA-25-11-08/2020
High Court of Malaysia24 April 2024
(vi) In the determination of whether an applicant was adversely affected is a question for the court to determine, having regard to the factual and legal matrix of the grievance. In so doing, the court will adopt a broad and flexible approach. O. 53 r.2(4) is not to be construed
J-01(NCvC)(W)-275-05/2021
Court of Appeal of Malaysia1 April 2024
in the Singapore High Court case of STU v The Comptroller of Income Tax [1962] 1 MLJ 220, at 221, Tan Ah Tah J gave the following judgment-In this case certain explanations given by the appellant to the officers of the Income Tax Department were rejected on the ground that th
W-04(NCvC)(W)-330-07/2022
Court of Appeal of Malaysia19 February 2024
in the Singapore High Court case of STU v The Comptroller of Income Tax [1962] 1 MLJ 220, at 221, Tan Ah Tah J gave the following judgment- "In this case certain explanations given by the appellant to the officers of the Income Tax Department were rejected on the ground that
B-01(A)-21-01/2023
Court of Appeal of Malaysia30 January 2024
34. In the Federal Court case of Khong Teng Khen, at p. 170, Suffian LP delivered the following 2-1 majority judgment: "Article 8 guarantees to all persons equality before the law and its equal protection. Regulations 6,7,13,19,20 and 21 prescribe rules of procedure and evidence