Malaysia legal search
Showing 10 results — more on the next page
W-01(A)-449-08/2021
Court of Appeal of Malaysia29 April 2024
(ii) the learned Judge had also declared that DGIR’s requests, made through letters and emails dated 23 November 2018, 8 April 2019, 29 April 2019, 17 May 2019, 12 December 2018, and 12 November 2019, for Getting to disclose customers’ personal data to be invalid. [28] The other
WA-22NCC-279-07/2020
High Court of Malaysia29 March 2023
(ii) the Reference number of U366 contained in the Registration Form is sufficient for them to identity the Property and therefore they do not need any serial number. [41] I have treated P2 and his friend PW5’s testimonies with caution that they have attended the auction, and th
W-01(IM)-37-01/2022
Court of Appeal of Malaysia7 February 2023
5.7 The Proposed Interveners, dissatisfied with the Applicant's reply, filed this application to this court to seek an Order to intervene in this judicial review proceeding and be named as Respondents. The Law [6] The law on intervention or joinder of parties is trite and well
WA-22NCvC-830-12/2021
High Court of Malaysia27 October 2023
23. The Plaintiff have also claimed that the Defendants did breach the Personal Data Protection Act 2010 and the Legal Profession Act in causing the purchasers to agree to be represented by the Defendants.
W-01(NCvC)(W)-57-01/2021
Court of Appeal of Malaysia28 June 2022
W-01 (NCvC) (W)-57-01/2021 Kand. 84 11/01/2023 12:10:49 DALAM MAHKAMAH RAYUAN MALAYSIA (BIDANG KUASA RAYUAN) RAYUAN SIVIL NO: W-01(NCvC)(W)-57-01/2021 ANTARA ... PERAYU-PERAYU DAN PERSATUAN PENDUDUK TAMAN BANGSAR KUALA LUMPUR ... (NO. PENDAFTARAN: PPM-002-14-04081971)
24NCC-49-02/2013
High Court of Malaysia25 May 2022
12.5 the disclosure of EPF information is not allowed under the Personal Data Protection Act 2010 (“PDPA”). **Note : Serial number will be used to verify the originality of this document via eFILING portal 9 Court’s Analysis and Decision [14] The application against the 2nd
WA-23NCvC-61-08/2022
High Court of Malaysia8 December 2022
Lampiran 4 adalah permohonan Plaintif untuk dapatkan injuksi interim menghalang Defendan daripada menyiarkan 4 pernyataan yang dkatakan fitnah terhadap Plaintif. Rujukan kepada perenggan [3] 1 (a) hingga (d) di atas. [5] Pada setiap masa material Plaintif adalah seorang peguambe
JA-22NCvC-170-10/2019
High Court of Malaysia15 March 2022
Schedule 2: Articles of Agreement, Instruction and Conditions of Tender, Personal Data Protection Act 2010 Appendix – Privacy Policy, Sub-Contract Conditions and Appendix I, II, III, IV and V (Where Quantities form part of the contract), Supplementary Conditions to Contract, Unde
22NCVC-152-03/2017
High Court of Malaysia26 January 2021
Lampiran GN. I also took note that under Section 133 of Street, Drainage and Building Act 1974 (Act 133) provides that: 13 The State Authority shall have the power to make by-laws for or in respect of every purpose which is deemed by him necessary for carrying out the provisio
ORIGINATING SUMMONS NO.: WA-28JM-1-01/2021
High Court of Malaysia8 June 2021
25. It is submitted by the Applicant that Liew however subsequently exhibited a change in behaviour: 13 a. on 14.1.2021, Liew had without explanation decided to remove his solicitors and appoint a new firm of solicitors; b. he agreed to the Anton Piller Order without seeking to