Malaysia legislation

Section 167

of CONTRACTS ACT 1950

Section 167

Agent’s duty to communicate with principal

It is the duty of an agent, in cases of difficulty, to use all reasonable diligence in communicating with his principal, and in seeking to obtain his instructions.

Right of principal when agent deals, on his own account, in business of agency without principal’s consent 168.

If an agent deals on his own account in the business of the agency, without first obtaining the consent of his principal and acquainting him with all material circumstances which have come to his own knowledge on the subject, the principal may repudiate the transaction, if the case shows either that any material fact has been dishonestly concealed from him by the agent, or that the dealings of the agent have been disadvantageous to him.

(a)

A directs B to sell A‘s estate. B buys the estate for himself in the name of C. A, on discovering that B has bought the estate for himself, may repudiate the sale, if he can show that B has dishonestly concealed any material fact, or that the sale has been disadvantageous to him.

(b)

A directs B to sell A’s estate. B, on looking over the estate before selling it, finds a mine on the estate which is unknown to A. B informs A that he wishes to buy the estate for himself, but conceals the discovery of the mine. A allows

B to buy, in ignorance of the existence of the mine. A, on discovering that B knew of the mine at the time he bought the estate, may either repudiate or adopt the sale at his option.

Contracts 79

Principal’s right to benefit gained by agent dealing on his own account in business of agency 169.

If an agent, without the knowledge of his principal, deals in the business of the agency on his own account instead of on account of his principal, the principal is entitled to claim from the agent any benefit which may have resulted to him from the transaction.

A directs B, his agent, to buy a certain house for him. B tells A it cannot be bought, and buys the house for himself. A may, on discovering that B has bought the house, compel him to sell it to A at the price he gave for it.

Agent’s right of retainer out of sums received on principal’s account 170.

An agent may retain, out of any sums received on account of the principal in the business of the agency, all moneys due to himself in respect of advances made or expenses properly incurred by him in conducting such business, and also such remuneration as may be payable to him for acting as agent.

Agent’s duty to pay sums received for principal 171.

Subject to the deductions specified in section 170, the agent is bound to pay to his principal all sums received on his account.

When agent’s remuneration becomes due 172.

In the absence of any special contract, payment for the performance of any act is not due to the agent until the completion of the act; but an agent may detain moneys received by him on account of goods sold, although the whole of the goods consigned to him for sale may not have been sold, or although the sale may not be actually complete.

Agent not entitled to remuneration for business misconducted 173.

An agent who is guilty of misconduct in the business of the agency is not entitled to any remuneration in respect of that part of the business which he has misconducted.

80

(a)

A employs B to recover RM100,000 from C, and to lay it out on good security. B recovers the RM100,000 and lays out RM90, 000 on good security, but lays out RM10,000 on security which he ought to have known to be bad, whereby A loses RM2,000. B is entitled to remuneration for recovering the

RM100,000 and for investing the RM90,000. He is not entitled to any remuneration for investing the RM10,000, and he must make good the RM2,000 to A.

(b)

A employs B to recover RM1,000 from C. Through B’s misconduct the money is not recovered. B is entitled to no remuneration for his services, and must make good the loss.

Agent’s lien on principal’s property 174.

In the absence of any contract to the contrary, an agent is entitled to retain goods, papers, and other property, whether movable or immovable, of the principal received by him, until the amount due to himself for commission, disbursements, and services in respect of the same has been paid or accounted for to him.

Principal’s duty to Agent

Agent to be indemnified against consequences of lawful acts 175.

The employer of an agent is bound to indemnify him against the consequences of all lawful acts done by the agent in exercise of the authority conferred upon him.

(a)

B, at Kelang, under instructions from A, of Taiping, contracts with C to deliver certain goods to him. A does not send the goods to B, and C sues B for breach of contract. B informs A of the suit, and A authorizes him to defend the suit. B defends the suit, and is compelled to pay damages and costs, and incurs expenses. A is liable to B for such damages, costs and expenses.

(b)

B, a broker at Taiping, by the orders of A, a merchant there, contracts with C for the purchase of 10 casks of oil for A. Afterwards A refuses to receive the oil, and C sues B. B informs A, who repudiates the contract altogether. B defends, but unsuccessfully, and has to pay damages and costs, and incurs expenses. A is liable to B for such damages, costs and expenses.

Agent to be indemnified against consequences of acts done in good faith 176.

Where one person employs another to do an act, and the agent does the act in good faith, the employer is liable to indemnify the agent against the consequences of that act, though it cause an injury to the rights of third persons.

Contracts 81

(a)

A, a decree-holder and entitled to execution of B’s goods, requires the officer of the court to seize certain goods, representing them to be the goods of

B. The officer seizes the goods, and is sued by C, the true owner of the goods.

A is liable to indemnify the officer for the sum which he is compelled to pay to C, in consequence of obeying A’s directions.

(b)

B, at the request of A, sells goods in the possession of A, but which A had no right to dispose of. B does not know this, and hands over the proceeds of the sale to A. Afterwards C, the true owner of the goods, sues B and recovers the value of the goods and costs. A is liable to indemnify B for what he has been compelled to pay to C and for B’s own expenses.

Non-liability of employer of agent to do a criminal act 177.

Where one person employs another to do an act which is criminal, the employer is not liable to the agent, either upon an express or an implied promise, to indemnify him against the consequences of that act.

(a)

A employs B to beat C, and agrees to indemnify him against all consequences of the act. B thereupon beats C, and has to pay damages to C for so doing. A is not liable to indemnify B for those damages.

(b)

B, the proprietor of a newspaper, publishes, at A’s request, a libel upon

C in the paper, and A agrees to indemnify B against the consequences of the publication, and all costs and damages of any action in respect thereof. B is sued by C and has to pay damages, and also incurs expenses. A is not liable to

B upon the indemnity.

Compensation to agent for injury caused by principal’s neglect 178.

The principal must make compensation to his agent in respect of injury caused to the agent by the principal’s neglect or want of skill.

A employs B as a bricklayer in building a house, and puts up the scaffolding himself. The scaffolding is unskillfully put up, and B is in consequence hurt.

A must make compensation to B.

82

Effect of Agency on Contract with Third Persons

Enforcement and consequences of agent’s contracts 179.

Contracts entered into through an agent, and obligations arising from acts done by an agent, may be enforced in the same manner, and will have the same legal consequences as if the contracts had been entered into and the acts done by the principal in person.

(a)

A buys goods from B, knowing that he is an agent for their sale, but not knowing who is the principal. B’s principal is the person entitled to claim from

A the price of the goods, and A cannot, in a suit by the principal, set-off against that claim a debt due to himself from B.

(b)

A, being B’s agent, with authority to receive money on his behalf, receives from C a sum of money due to B. C is discharged of his obligation to pay the sum in question to B.

Principal how far bound when agent exceeds authority 180.

When an agent does more than he is authorized to do, and when the part of what he does, which is within his authority, can be separated from the part which is beyond his authority, so much only of what he does as is within his authority is binding as between him and his principal.

A, being owner of a ship and cargo, authorizes B to procure an insurance for

RM4,000 on the ship. B procures a policy for RM4,000 on the ship, and another for the like sum on the cargo. A is bound to pay the premium for the policy on the ship, but not the premium for the policy on the cargo.

Principal not bound when excess of agent’s authority is not separable 181.

Where an agent does more than he is authorized to do, and what he does beyond the scope of his authority cannot be separated from what is within it, the principal is not bound to recognise the transaction.

A authorizes B to buy 500 sheep for him. B buys 500 sheep and 200 lambs for one sum of RM6,000. A may repudiate the whole transaction.

Contracts 83

Consequences of notice given to agent 182.

Any notice given to or information obtained by the agent, provided it be given or obtained in the course of the business transacted by him for the principal, shall, as between the principal and third parties, have the same legal consequence as if it had been given to or obtained by the principal.

(a)

A is employed by B to buy from C certain goods, of which C is the apparent owner, and buys them accordingly. In the course of the treaty for the sale, A learns that the goods really belonged to D, but B is ignorant of that fact.

B is not entitled to set-off a debt owing to him from C against the price of the goods.

(b)

A is employed by B to buy from C goods of which C is the apparent owner. A was, before he was so employed, a servant of C, and then learnt that the goods really belonged to D, but B is ignorant of that fact. In spite of the knowledge of his agent, B may set-off against the price of the goods a debt owing to him from C.

Agent cannot personally enforce, nor be bound by, contracts on behalf of principal 183.

In the absence of any contract to that effect, an agent cannot personally enforce contracts entered into by him on behalf of his principal, nor is he personally bound by them.

Such a contract shall be presumed to exist in the following cases:

(a)

where the contract is made by an agent for the sale or purchase of goods for a merchant resident abroad;

(b)

where the agent does not disclose the name of his principal;

and

(c)

where the principal, though disclosed, cannot be sued.

Presumption of contract to contratry

Rights of parties to a contract made by agent not disclosed