/akn/my/act/pua/2020/353

KAEDAH-KAEDAH MAHKAMAH PERSEKUTUAN (PINDAAN) 2020

The full official text, structured for quick navigation. Copy any provision or jump straight to a section.

Open source PDF
Type
P.U. (A)
Status
In force
Enacted
2020
Sections
7

Quick answer

About this p.u. (a)

KAEDAH-KAEDAH MAHKAMAH PERSEKUTUAN (PINDAAN) 2020 is Malaysia P.U. (A), cited as P.U. (A) 353 2020, currently marked in force and first recorded in 2020.

Opening note

Preamble

Suggest a correction
  1. PADA menjalankan kuasa yang diberikan oleh seksyen 17 Akta Mahkamah Kehakiman 1964 [Akta 91] dan dengan persetujuan Ketua Hakim Negara, Jawatankuasa Kaedah-Kaedah membuat kaedah-kaedah yang berikut: Nama dan permulaan kuat kuasa

Seksyen 2

Kaedah-Kaedah Mahkamah Persekutuan 1995 [P.U. (A) 376/1995], yang disebut

Open as pageSuggest a correction

“Kaedah-Kaedah ibu” dalam Kaedah-Kaedah ini, dipinda dalam kaedah 107 dengan memasukkan selepas subkaedah (4) subkaedah yang berikut:

“(5)

In determining the application, the court may allow the applicant and the respondent to submit and reply orally, as the case may be, according to an allocated time as may be specified in the practice direction.”.

Seksyen 4

Kaedah baharu 127A

Open as pageSuggest a correction

kaedah yang berikut:

“Proceedings through remote communication technology.

Seksyen 127A

Open as pageSuggest a correction

(2)

The Court or Registrar may direct that any cause or matter under these

Rules is to be heard or any proceeding is to be conducted through a remote communication technology as approved by the Court.

Suggest a correction

(3)

The power conferred on the

Court or Registrar in subrule (2) may be exercised on its own motion or upon application made by any party to a proceeding.

Suggest a correction

(4)

Where an application is made under subrule (3), the Court or Registrar may give directions as to the further conduct of the proceedings in relation to the cause or matter.

Suggest a correction

(5)

For the purpose of this rule, the procedure and practice in the Rules of

Court 2012 shall apply mutatis mutandis.”.

Dibuat 14 Disember 2020

[PKPMP.BD.600-1/5/26; PN(PU2)323]

P.U. (A) 353 4

Jawatankuasa Kaedah-Kaedah:

TUN TENGKU MAIMUN BINTI TUAN MAT

Ketua Hakim Negara, Malaysia

TAN SRI ROHANA BINTI YUSUF

TAN SRI DATO’ SRI AZAHAR BIN MOHAMED

Hakim Besar Mahkamah Tinggi di Malaya

DATO’ ABANG ISKANDAR BIN ABANG HASHIM

Hakim Besar Mahkamah Tinggi di Sabah and Sarawak

TAN SRI IDRUS BIN HARUN

Peguam Negara, Malaysia

DATO’ SERI HAJI MOHD ZAWAWI BIN SALLEH

Hakim Mahkamah Persekutuan

DATUK HAJJAH AZIZAH BINTI HAJI NAWAWI

Hakim Mahkamah Rayuan

TUAN COLLIN LAWRENCE SEQUERAH

Hakim Mahkamah Tinggi di Malaya

TUAN AZHAHARI KAMAL BIN RAMLI

Hakim Mahkamah Tinggi di Sabah and Sarawak

TUAN AHMAD TERRIRUDIN BIN MOHD SALLEH

Ketua Pendaftar Mahkamah Persekutuan

ENCIK SALIM BIN BASHIR BHASKARAN

Peguam Bela, Semenanjung Malaysia

5

ENCIK ROGER CHIN KEN FONG

Peguam Bela, Sabah

ENCIK RANBIR SINGH SANGHA

Peguam Bela, Sarawak

[Akan dibentangkan di

Dewan

Rakyat menurut subseksyen 17(5)

Akta Mahkamah Kehakiman 1964]

P.U. (A) 353 6

COURTS OF JUDICATURE ACT 1964

RULES OF THE FEDERAL COURT (AMENDMENT) 2020

Suggest a correction

Opening note

Preamble

Suggest a correction
  1. IN exercise of the powers conferred by section 17 of the Courts of Judicature Act 1964 [Act 91] and with the consent of the Chief Justice, the Rules Committee makes the following rules: Citation and commencement 1.

(1)

These rules may be cited as the Rules of the Federal Court

(Amendment) 2020.

Suggest a correction

(2)

These Rules come into operation on 15 December 2020.

Amendment of rule 107 2.

The Rules of the Federal Court 1995 [P.U. (A) 376/1995], which are referred to as the “principle Rules” in these Rules, are amended in rule 107 by inserting after subrule (4) the following subrule:

“(5)

In determining the application, the court may allow the applicant and the respondent to submit and reply orally, as the case may be, according to an allocated time as may be specified in the practice direction.”.

Amendment of rule 110 3.

Rule 110 of the principal Rules is amended by inserting after the word “business”

the words “of the Court and”.

7

New rule 127A

Suggest a correction

Seksyen 4

Suggest a correction

The principal Rules are amended by inserting after rule 127 the following rule:

“Proceedings through remote communication technology.

Seksyen 127A

Suggest a correction

(2)

The Court or Registrar may direct that any cause or matter under these

Rules is to be heard or any proceeding is to be conducted through a remote communication technology as approved by the Court.

Suggest a correction

(3)

The power conferred on the

Court or Registrar in subrule (2) may be exercised on its own motion or upon application made by any party to a proceeding.

Suggest a correction

(4)

Where an application is made under subrule (3), the Court or Registrar may give directions as to the further conduct of the proceedings in relation to the cause or matter.

Suggest a correction

(5)

For the purpose of this rule, the procedure and practice in the Rules of

Court 2012 shall apply mutatis mutandis.”.

Made 14 December 2020

[PKPMP.BD.600-1/5/26; PN(PU2)323]

P.U. (A) 353 8

Rules Committee:

TUN TENGKU MAIMUN BINTI TUAN MAT

Chief Justice, Malaysia

TAN SRI ROHANA BINTI YUSUF

President of the Court of Appeal, Malaysia

TAN SRI DATO’ SRI AZAHAR BIN MOHAMED

Chief Judge of the High Court in Malaya

DATO’ ABANG ISKANDAR BIN ABANG HASHIM

Chief Judge of the High Court in Sabah and Sarawak

TAN SRI IDRUS BIN HARUN

Attorney General, Malaysia

DATO’ SERI HAJI MOHD ZAWAWI BIN SALLEH

Judge of the Federal Court

DATUK HAJJAH AZIZAH BINTI HAJI NAWAWI

Judge of the Court of Appeal

TUAN COLLIN LAWRENCE SEQUERAH

Judge of the High Court in Malaya

TUAN AZHAHARI KAMAL BIN RAMLI

Judge of the High Court in Sabah and Sarawak

TUAN AHMAD TERRIRUDIN BIN MOHD SALLEH

Chief Registrar of the Federal Court

ENCIK SALIM BIN BASHIR BHASKARAN

Advocate, Peninsular Malaysia

9

ENCIK ROGER CHIN KEN FONG

Advocate, Sabah

ENCIK RANBIR SINGH SANGHA

Advocate, Sarawak

[To be laid before the Dewan Rakyat pursuant to subsection 17(5) of the

Courts of Judicature Act 1964]

Suggest a correction

Common questions

What is KAEDAH-KAEDAH MAHKAMAH PERSEKUTUAN (PINDAAN) 2020?
KAEDAH-KAEDAH MAHKAMAH PERSEKUTUAN (PINDAAN) 2020 is Malaysia P.U. (A), cited as P.U. (A) 353 2020, currently marked in force and first recorded in 2020.
Is KAEDAH-KAEDAH MAHKAMAH PERSEKUTUAN (PINDAAN) 2020 still in force?
Yes — KAEDAH-KAEDAH MAHKAMAH PERSEKUTUAN (PINDAAN) 2020 is currently in force.
When did KAEDAH-KAEDAH MAHKAMAH PERSEKUTUAN (PINDAAN) 2020 take effect?
KAEDAH-KAEDAH MAHKAMAH PERSEKUTUAN (PINDAAN) 2020 was first recorded in 2020.
How many sections does KAEDAH-KAEDAH MAHKAMAH PERSEKUTUAN (PINDAAN) 2020 have?
KAEDAH-KAEDAH MAHKAMAH PERSEKUTUAN (PINDAAN) 2020 contains 7 sections.
Where can I read the official version of KAEDAH-KAEDAH MAHKAMAH PERSEKUTUAN (PINDAAN) 2020?
The official text of KAEDAH-KAEDAH MAHKAMAH PERSEKUTUAN (PINDAAN) 2020 is published at lom.agc.gov.my.
KAEDAH-KAEDAH MAHKAMAH PERSEKUTUAN (PINDAAN) 2020 (No. 353)