Skip to content
In forceUpdated to 1 Nov 2017Read it in Bahasa Malaysia
Contents

Chapter II

54. Previous bad character not relevant except in reply

Feedback & support
(1)

In criminal proceedings the fact that the accused person has a bad character is irrelevant, unless evidence has been given that he has a good character, in which case it becomes relevant.

(2)

A person charged and called as a witness shall not be asked, and if asked shall not be required to answer, any question tending to show that he has committed, or been convicted of or been charged with, any offence other than that wherewith he is then charged, or is of bad character, unless—

(a)

the proof that he has committed or been convicted of that other offence is admissible evidence to show that he is guilty of the offence wherewith he is then charged;

Evidence 47

(b)

he has personally or by his advocate asked questions of the witnesses for the prosecution with a view to establish his own good character, or has given evidence of his good character, or the nature or conduct of the defence is such as to involve imputations on the character of the prosecutor or the witnesses for the prosecution; or

(c)

he has given evidence against any other person charged with the same offence.

Explanation 1—This section does not apply to cases in which the bad character of any person is itself a fact in issue.

Explanation 2—A previous conviction is relevant as evidence of bad character.

Report

Part II

Proof

Chapter III

Facts Which Need Not Be Proved

Chapter IV

Oral Evidence

Chapter V

Chapter VI

Exclusion of Oral by Documentary Evidence

Part III

Production and Effect of Evidence

Chapter VII

Burden of Proof

Chapter VIII

Estoppel

Chapter IX

Witnesses

Chapter X

Examination of Witnesses

Chapter XI

Improper Admission and Rejection of Evidence