Skip to content

Section 27

of Hire - Purchase Act 1967

ActIn forceProvision 41 of 91

Section 27

(1)

In any proceedings taken in any court in respect of any difference or dispute arising out of a contract of insurance if it appears to the court that a failure by the insured or the hirer under the hire-purchase agreement concerned to observe or perform a term or condition of the contract of insurance may reasonably be excused on the ground that the insurer was not prejudiced by the failure, the court may, unless an order excusing the failure has already been made under subsection (2), order that the failure be excused.

(2)

Where a difference or dispute has arisen out of a contract of insurance, the insured or the hirer under the hire-purchase agreement concerned or any guarantor in respect of that agreement may, unless an order excusing the failure concerned has already been made under subsection (1), apply to the court for an order that the failure to observe or perform a term or condition of the contract of insurance be excused;

46 Laws of Malaysia ACT 212

and if it appears to the court that the failure may reasonably be excused on the ground that the insurer was not prejudiced by the failure, the court may order that the failure be excused.

(3)

Where an order of the nature referred to in subsections (1)

and (2) has been made the rights and liabilities of all persons in respect of the contract of insurance concerned shall be determined as if the failure the subject of the order had not occurred.