Kaedah-Kaedah Mahkamah Tinggi (Pindaan) 2011
The full official text, structured for quick navigation. Copy any provision or jump straight to a section.
- Enacted
- 2011
- Sections
- 11
Kaedah-Kaedah Mahkamah Tinggi (Pindaan) 2011 is Malaysia P.U. (A), cited as P.U. (A) 210 2011, currently marked in force and first recorded in 2011.
Front matterCover and publication detailsOpenClose
P.U. (A) 210
WARTA KERAJAAN PERSEKUTUAN
FEDERAL GOVERNMENT
GAZETTE
KAEDAH-KAEDAH MAHKAMAH TINGGI
(PINDAAN) 2011
RULES OF THE HIGH COURT (AMENDMENT) 2011
DISIARKAN OLEH/
JABATAN PEGUAM NEGARA/
ATTORNEY GENERAL’S CHAMBERS
P.U. (A) 210 2
AKTA MAHKAMAH KEHAKIMAN 1964
KAEDAH-KAEDAH MAHKAMAH TINGGI (PINDAAN) 2011
Opening note
Preamble
- PADA menjalankan kuasa yang diberikan oleh seksyen 17 Akta Mahkamah Kehakiman 1964 [Akta 91] dan dengan persetujuan Hakim Besar Mahkamah Tinggi di Malaya dan Hakim Besar Mahkamah Tinggi di Sabah dan Sarawak, Jawatankuasa Kaedah-Kaedah membuat kaedah-kaedah yang berikut: Nama dan permulaan kuat kuasa
Seksyen 2
Kaedah-Kaedah Mahkamah Tinggi 1980 [P.U. (A) 50/1980], yang disebut
“Kaedah-Kaedah ibu” dalam Kaedah-Kaedah ini, dipinda dengan menggantikan perkataan “8
per centum” di mana-mana jua terdapat dengan perkataan
“4 per centum”.
Pindaan Aturan 35A
Seksyen 3
Aturan 35A Kaedah-Kaedah ibu dipinda –
(a)
dengan menggantikan kaedah 1 dengan kaedah yang berikut:
“Evidence-in-chief by way of witness statement.
Seksyen 1
Unless otherwise ordered by the Court, any witness in an action commenced by writ shall give his evidence-in-chief by way of witness statement, in the form of question and answer, tendered and read at the hearing before the witness is cross-examined on his witness statement.”; dan
P.U. (A) 210 3
(b)
dengan menggantikan kaedah 2 dengan kaedah yang berikut:
“Copy of witness statement to be furnished to the other party.
Seksyen 2
Unless otherwise ordered by the Court, a copy of such witness statement shall be furnished to the other party not later than 7 days prior to it being tendered and read at the hearing.”.
Pindaan Aturan 92
Seksyen 4
Aturan 92 Kaedah-Kaedah ibu dipinda -
(a)
dalam kaedah 2, dengan memasukkan selepas perkataan “Court”
perkataan “,and such seal shall include an electronic seal”; dan
Seksyen 5
Any document required to be filed or issued under these Rules may be filed or issued electronically; and such filing or issue shall be deemed to comply with these Rules.”.
Dibuat 24 Jun 2011
[JK/MP 322 Jld.4; PN(PU2)153/XIV]
TUN DATO’ SERI ZAKI BIN TUN AZMI
Ketua Hakim Negara, Malaysia
TAN SRI ABDUL GANI PATAIL
Peguam Negara, Malaysia
TAN SRI DATO’ SERI ALAUDDIN BIN DATO’ MOHD SHERIFF
Presiden Mahkamah Rayuan, Malaysia
TAN SRI ARIFFIN BIN ZAKARIA
Hakim Besar Mahkamah Tinggi di Malaya
P.U. (A) 210 4
TAN SRI DATUK SERI PANGLIMA RICHARD MALANJUM
Hakim Besar Mahkamah Tinggi di Sabah dan Sarawak
TAN SRI JAMES FOONG CHENG YUEN
Hakim Mahkamah Persekutuan
DATO’ JEFFREY TAN KOK WHA
Hakim Mahkamah Rayuan
DATUK DR. HAJI HAMID SULTAN BIN ABU BACKER
Hakim Mahkamah Tinggi di Malaya
DATUK DAVID WONG DAK WAH
Hakim Mahkamah Tinggi di Sabah dan Sarawak
PUAN AZIZAH BINTI MAHMUD
Hakim Kanan Mahkamah Sesyen, Kuala Lumpur
ENCIK LIM CHEE WEE
Peguam bela, Semenanjung Malaysia
DATUK JOHN SIKAYUN
Peguam bela, Sabah
ENCIK KHAIRIL AZMI BIN MOHD HASBIE
Peguam bela, Sarawak
[Akan dibentangkan di Dewan Rakyat menurut subseksyen 17(5) Akta Mahkamah
Kehakiman 1964]
P.U. (A) 210 5
COURTS OF JUDICATURE ACT 1964
RULES OF THE HIGH COURT (AMENDMENT) 2011
Opening note
Preamble
- IN exercise of the powers conferred by section 17 of the Courts of Judicature Act 1964 [Act 91] and with the consent of the Chief Judge of the High Court in Malaya and the Chief Judge of the High Court in Sabah and Sarawak, the Rules Committee makes the following rules: Citation and commencement 1.
(2)
Rule 4 is deemed to have come into operation on 1 March 2011.
General amendment 2.
The Rules of the High Court 1980 [P.U. (A) 50/1980], which are referred to as the “principal Rules” in these Rules, are amended by substituting for the words
“8 per centum” wherever they appear the words “4 per centum”.
Amendment of Order 35A
Seksyen 3
Order 35A of the principal Rules is amended –
(a)
by substituting for rule 1 the following rule:
“Evidence-in-chief by way of witness statement.
Seksyen 1
Unless otherwise ordered by the Court, any witness in an action commenced by writ shall give his evidence-in-chief by way of witness statement, in the form of question and answer, tendered and read at the hearing before the witness is cross-examined on his witness statement.”; and
P.U. (A) 210 6
(b)
by substituting for rule 2 the following rule:
“Copy of witness statement to be furnished to the other party.
Seksyen 2
Unless otherwise ordered by the Court, a copy of such witness statement shall be furnished to the other party not later than 7 days prior to it being tendered and read at the hearing.”.
Amendment of Order 92 4.
Order 92 of the principal Rules is amended –
(a)
in rule 2, by inserting after the word “Court” the words “,and such seal shall include an electronic seal”; and
Seksyen 5
Any document required to be filed or issued under these Rules may be filed or issued electronically; and such filing or issue shall be deemed to comply with these Rules.”.
Made 24 June 2011
[JK/MP 322 Jld.4; PN(PU2)153/XIV]
TUN DATO’ SERI ZAKI BIN TUN AZMI
Chief Justice, Malaysia
TAN SRI ABDUL GANI PATAIL
Attorney General, Malaysia
TAN SRI DATO’ SERI ALAUDDIN BIN DATO’ MOHD SHERIFF
President of the Court of Appeal, Malaysia
TAN SRI ARIFFIN BIN ZAKARIA
Chief Judge of the High Court in Malaya
P.U. (A) 210 7
TAN SRI DATUK SERI PANGLIMA RICHARD MALANJUM
Chief Judge of the High Court in Sabah and Sarawak
TAN SRI JAMES FOONG CHENG YUEN
Judge of the Federal Court
DATO’ JEFFREY TAN KOK WHA
Judge of the Court of Appeal
DATUK DR. HAJI HAMID SULTAN BIN ABU BACKER
Judge of the High Court in Malaya
DATUK DAVID WONG DAK WAH
Judge of the High Court in Sabah and Sarawak
PUAN AZIZAH BINTI MAHMUD
Senior Sessions Court Judge, Kuala Lumpur
ENCIK LIM CHEE WEE
Advocate, Peninsular Malaysia
DATUK JOHN SIKAYUN
Advocate, Sabah
ENCIK KHAIRIL AZMI BIN MOHD HASBIE
Advocate, Sarawak
[To be laid before the Dewan Rakyat pursuant to subsection 17(5) of the Courts of
Judicature Act 1964]
Common questions
- What is Kaedah-Kaedah Mahkamah Tinggi (Pindaan) 2011?
- Kaedah-Kaedah Mahkamah Tinggi (Pindaan) 2011 is Malaysia P.U. (A), cited as P.U. (A) 210 2011, currently marked in force and first recorded in 2011.
- Is Kaedah-Kaedah Mahkamah Tinggi (Pindaan) 2011 still in force?
- Yes — Kaedah-Kaedah Mahkamah Tinggi (Pindaan) 2011 is currently in force.
- When did Kaedah-Kaedah Mahkamah Tinggi (Pindaan) 2011 take effect?
- Kaedah-Kaedah Mahkamah Tinggi (Pindaan) 2011 was first recorded in 2011.
- How many sections does Kaedah-Kaedah Mahkamah Tinggi (Pindaan) 2011 have?
- Kaedah-Kaedah Mahkamah Tinggi (Pindaan) 2011 contains 11 sections.
- Where can I read the official version of Kaedah-Kaedah Mahkamah Tinggi (Pindaan) 2011?
- The official text of Kaedah-Kaedah Mahkamah Tinggi (Pindaan) 2011 is published at lom.agc.gov.my.
Something wrong on this page?
If one provision's text doesn't match the official source, use Suggest a fix beside that provision — it opens an editor next to the source document. For anything else — a missing amendment, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — report it here.