Malaysia legal search
Showing 10 results — more on the next page
These titles are closer to what you typed than the results below.
Can't find the law you need?
Tell us what's missingNot finding it?
Ask the AI assistant — answers grounded in Malaysian legislation, with citations.
Act 788 2017
Schedule 13. The provisions of the Schedule shall apply to the members of the Authority and the members of a committee appointed under section 11. Code of conduct 14. (1) The Authority shall, subject to the approval by the Minister prescribe a code of conduct...
Act 731 2011
Schedule 9) [P.U. (B) 277/2013] and 1 January 2015 (for paragraphs 1 to 10 of Schedule 9 and paragraphs 13 to 19 of Schedule 9) [P.U. (B) 553/2014]. 24 Laws of Malaysia (e) the licensee has contravened any of the conditions of its licenc
Act 671 2007
Schedule 4 with the provisions of sections 91, 92, 92A, 93, 97 and 139ZN and any regulation or guideline made pursuant to aforementioned sections. (7) For the purposes of subsection (6), an authorized person may― (a) require a registered person to furnish him...
Act 636 1966
SCHEDULE (Section 3) ARTICLES OF THE VIENNA CONVENTION ON DIPLOMATIC RELATIONS (1961) HAVING THE FORCE OF LAW IN MALAYSIA ARTICLE I For the purpose of the present Convention, the following expressions shall have the meanings hereunder assigned to them: (a) th...
WA-24NCvC-4892-12/2024
High Court of Malaysia9 January 2026
19. This principle was subsequently affirmed in My Home Budget Hotel Sdn Bhd v CIMB Bank Bhd [2022] 5 CLJ 604, where the court held: “[85] In the recent decision of Newlake Development Sdn Bhd v. Zenith Delight Sdn Bhd & Ors (No 2) [2021] 7 CLJ 88, the court ruled that the PDPA
BA-24NCvC-276-02/2026
High Court of Malaysia3 June 2026
55. The Defendant’s reliance on the Personal Data Protection Act 2010 cannot operate as an absolute answer to a lawful discovery application. As recognised in Newlake Development, that Act cannot be used to avoid a valid order of Court. No such order, however, was sought or obtai
WA-22NCvC-567-08/2021
High Court of Malaysia29 January 2026
Jadual Pembayaran Pulangan tersebut. 11. Disebabkan Plaintif tidak menerima pembayaran pulangan bagi bulan yang ke-19 dan Modal Pelaburan Plaintif tersebut, maka Plaintif telah memulakan tindakan ini terhadap Defendan-Defendan. ISU BERBANGKIT 12. Isu yang berbangkit dalam tind
WA-24NCvC-4892-12/2024
High Court of Malaysia27 March 2026
28. In the conversion application decided on 9 January 2026, I struck out the second defendant's counterclaim. The rationale for that decision is crucial to the present application. I held that the counterclaim for transit losses, said to be incurred between September 2022 to Dec
JB-24NCvC-406-08/2025
High Court of Malaysia21 April 2026
7. Kes Cimb Bank Berhad V. Roebuck Development Sdn Bhd & Ors [2021] MLRHU 48 dirujuk dimana Mahkamah mendapati: - “[23] The Personal Data Protection Act prohibits the disclosure of personal data collected for commercial purposes unless consent is duly given by the person whose p
BA-24NCvC-2033-09/2025
High Court of Malaysia9 March 2026
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF MALAYA IN SHAH ALAM IN THE STATE OF SELANGOR DARUL EHSAN CIVIL SUIT NO.: BA-24NCvC-2033-09/2025 In the matter of Order 24 Rule 7A of the Rules of Court 2012, Section 25(2) and Paragraph 14 Schedule to the Court of Judicature Act 1964 and Section 5(1)(g)