Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission Act 2009 · Updated to 20 May 2022 · Part VI · Evidence
51. Evidence of corroboration
Feedback & supportIn any proceedings against any person for an offence under this Act, it may be proved that at or about the time of the alleged offence, or at any time thereafter, the accused, or any relative or associate of his—
held any property for which he, or his relative or associate, as the case may be, is unable to give a satisfactory account as to how he came into its ownership, possession, custody or control; or
property
“property” means real or personal property of every description, including money, whether situated in Malaysia or elsewhere, whether tangible or intangible, and includes an interest in any such real or personal property;
had entered into any dealing for the acquisition of any property and he is unable to satisfactorily account for the consideration for which it is to be acquired, and the evidence in relation thereto shall be presumed to corroborate any evidence relating to the commission of the offence.
dealing
“dealing” includes— (a) any purchase, sale, loan, charge, mortgage, lien, pledge, caveat, transfer, delivery, assignment, subrogation, transmission, gift, donation, trust, settlement, deposit, withdrawal, transfer between accounts, or extension of credit; (b) any agency or grant of power of attorney; and (c) any act which results in any right, interest, title or privilege, whether present or future or whether vested or contingent, in the whole of or in part of any property being conferred on any person.
Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission 59